News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > N95 or K810 Bookmark topic

i cant see why you cant compare?
theyre both mobile phones right?
obviously the n95 has much better specs in some areas, but lacks in the camera topic but it is the best all rounder imo
the k810 is a good tidy phone with nice features, not as high spec as the n95 tho.
they are comparable, people are just saying theyre not because one's a smartphone and the other isnt or for whatever reason.

--
Posted: 2007-03-28 23:00:33
Edit : Quote




@pow - I think you got it wrong pal . . . The N95 already has the 5 MP camera, whereas the K810, only a - 3.2 MP, the rumored (or is it true - now?), K850 will be donning a 5 MP camfone, that's where the N95 should be compared at . . . !
--
Posted: 2007-03-28 23:22:19
Edit : Quote


well specs wise n95 is far superior than the k8's but camera wise i doubt so.. the k8's re cybershot phones..i dont even think the 5mp of n95 can par up with k800's 3.2mp nokia has a record of making sucky cameras
--
Posted: 2007-03-29 07:12:16
Edit : Quote


yeah, the specs and the reality... "cybershot"... Most cybershot cameras make acceptable video; can't really say that of k800 now, can you? Maybe we actually wait and see what N95 does and how well it does it or not... but I, on second thought, thinkl it's not too crazy to compare the two - cannot be the only one who was ever 95percent set on one model, to then buy a totally different one?! (k800 but, luickily went for e61...)... So the only prob here is that no one's actually worked with n95 - but have penty of practice with k800 and stereotypes and ad-hype... might be far dodgier to compare, say n73 and k800 (look at THAT thread!!!). The obvious similarities tend to bring out the taste-bias much more... This thread seems considerate in comparison!!!
--
Posted: 2007-03-29 07:53:15
Edit : Quote


I've used both the K750 and N90 (at present . . .), both - 2 MP camfones, and I can say that the K750 captures 'sharper' images compared with that of the N90, however, if we are to compare a 3.2 MP to a 5 MP . . . I guess that's TOTALLY another story, and I will still GO with the 5 MP here !
--
Posted: 2007-03-29 23:23:21
Edit : Quote


Hey, how about looking at how they compare for basic functions. They are meant to be a mobile phone. How do they compare in that aspect? I think I would rather have a phone that doesn't need charging everyday. The N95 looks like is going to have bad battery life. Would you want a phone where the battery may let you down because you used the functions of the phone for one day? Not me. I know you can play MP3's all day long on a SE, use the camera, play games, txt and make phone calls and probably still have 50% or more charge at the end of the day. I wonder how the N95 would go doing the same thing? That would be enough to put me off.
--
Posted: 2007-03-30 01:54:15
Edit : Quote


All the mp battle is really down to the sensor chip, cuz in gsmarena i saw a review of LG 5mp phone , SE K800 , and Nokia N73. And in the end k800 came out in better position than the 5mp lg. Same as S700 1.3mp and the first 2mp phones from competition
--
Posted: 2007-03-30 02:18:38
Edit : Quote


i'll definitely go for the N95. i don't like the sony cyber shot cams anyway for i prefer olympus which is way better overall.
--
Posted: 2007-03-30 04:48:51
Edit : Quote


No comparison at the moment. N95 would be the better phone at the moment. The better phone to compare to the K810 would be the N93. Once SE comes out with a Cybershot 5MP camera phone, then we can start to compare it with the N95. What do you guys think about the 2-way slider concept that Nokia used with the N95? Is the N95 enough of a phone for you guys to switch over to Nokia?
--
Posted: 2007-03-30 05:06:55
Edit : Quote


that slider solution is the reason i wouldnt go for n95,dont trust those display cables

This message was posted from a E60-1
--
Posted: 2007-03-30 09:17:49
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index