>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> T650i vs K810i (with live pics)
Bookmark topic
Great show
I feel SE has done a good job by getting the four-way navigation key-pad rather then the prone-to-jam Joystick.....GOOD MOVE!!!
Also the metallic body and scratch-proof screen will make the T650i a big hit
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 09:56:08
Edit :
Quote
what about T650's video recording cap.?
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:01:39
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-29 09:56:08, mailboxmanoj wrote:
Great show
I feel SE has done a good job by getting the four-way navigation key-pad rather then the prone-to-jam Joystick.....GOOD MOVE!!!
Also the metallic body and scratch-proof screen will make the T650i a big hit
Sure as!
It will feel great to hold - just like the W880i - small, weighty and well built. I also wanna see what this new mineral screen is all about.
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:05:58
Edit :
Quote
@qvga
video has not been confirmed yet. But

have 'successfully' tested vga @30fps on the t650 and sofia.... guess it just comes down to what resolution the company execs choose.....
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:07:23
Edit :
Quote
@goldenface: i guess the mineral screen will be something like the scratch resistant one on the nokia 8800
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:09:51
Edit :
Quote
I will tell u why Nokia is making a big mistake:
They have like fools abandoned the metallic form and gone plastic with the N95,a bad move from the built point of view and also from the enviroment point of view.
SE can do us a big favour by getting in strong metallic cell frames which are long-lasting and also re-cycleable,also they are very very sturdy giving the tough look.
[ This Message was edited by: mailboxmanoj on 2007-05-29 09:18 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:14:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-29 10:14:16, mailboxmanoj wrote:
I will tell u why Nokia is making a big mistake:
They have like fools abandoned the metallic form and gone plastic with the N95,a bad move from the built point of view and also from the enviroment point of view.
SE can do us a big favour by getting in strong metallic cell frames which are long-lasting and also re-cycleable,also they are very very sturdy giving the torugh look.
you really have no idea what you're talking about, do you? N95 is already very expensive, adding metallic structure similar to 8800 would make its price go off the roof. And also, metal frames are not long lasting, they get scratched and bent easily no matter what you use. Plastic has been working for all manufacturers including SE and thats where they should stick.
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:19:11
Edit :
Quote
Nope u did not get my point..
N95 is expensive for its features,but a plastic body makes it no doubt very light but not good for ur daily use,also plastic has no ending u cannot destroy it...
Metallic frames are prone to scratches but they can minimise it by adding scratch proof mechanisms....
Anybody will tell you plastic is harmful for enviroment.
also there is going to be a big question of recycling phones once the Technology dies out...
[ This Message was edited by: mailboxmanoj on 2007-05-29 09:25 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:25:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-29 10:25:20, mailboxmanoj wrote:
Nope u did not get my point..
N95 is expensive for its features,but a plastic body makes it no doubt very light but not good for ur daily use,also plastic has no ending u cannot destroy it...
Metallic frames are prone to scratches but they can minimise it by adding scratch proof mechanisms....
Anybody will tell you plastic is harmful for enviroment.
also there is going to be a big question of recycling phones once the Technology dies out...
[ This Message was edited by: mailboxmanoj on 2007-05-29 09:25 ]
it would have made the phone ridiculously expensive, its that simple.
why didnt SE make P1 full metallic? simply because it would then be too expensive.
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:32:07
Edit :
Quote
Thats OK.
It depends on what type of a person u are,I can compramise on a few features in my phone but would rather make it sturdy and tough from outside.
--
Posted: 2007-05-29 10:35:22
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply