Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Cellphone Suggestion
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Cellphone Suggestion Bookmark topic
Page <  1234>

hgautam Posts: > 500


On 2007-10-01 08:40:28, QVGA wrote:
Nokia 1100 or 1600. Aint no better entry level phone.
And spare yourself from K3xx series because they are terrible.



Have you even used a K310/K320??? And do you know their current prices as well???

I have had one and its like a mini K750... And no joystick problems either...
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 09:10:02
Edit : Quote

dancingfate Posts: > 500


On 2007-10-01 08:40:28, QVGA wrote:
And spare yourself from K3xx series because they are terrible.

K300's keypad is the most SE's comfortable keypad IMHO.
I have a K310 now and think that it's a great phone for low-end (refer to the price range). The screen is not too bad for 65k (don't expect 256k QVGA, it's a K3xx series), Contacts can store up to 1000 names (2500 fields), texting is easy and fast. Want more? It's small and cute.
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 09:18:48
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500


On 2007-10-01 08:50:51, Rifqi_Aziz wrote:
Nokia 1100 or 1600 doesn't have bluetooh AFAIK, they're very very low end entry level phone IMHO.



Yeah so? When you already have a phone with all that and you need another one just for safety purposes then BT is utterly useless. K3xx suffer from terrible screen quality, 128x160 is a pain on the eyes.
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 14:01:01
Edit : Quote

Aware Posts: > 500

And 98x65 is even worse than 128x160......


--
Posted: 2007-10-01 14:17:17
Edit : Quote

shaliron Posts: > 500

If you want bluetooth, I'd suggest:
- SE Z310
- SE W300 (could be very cheap these days)
- SE Z520 (again, could be very cheap)
- Nokia 6103

I don't suggest the cheap K series, because the joysticks are really poor on those phones.

Although, the phones that I suggested may look too expensive, even if they are low end phones
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 14:27:17
Edit : Quote

tranced Posts: > 500

@shaliron: never thought in those choices(z310 and z520). they are also cheap and reliable.
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 14:28:36
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500


On 2007-10-01 14:17:17, Aware wrote:
And 98x65 is even worse than 128x160......




no, monochrome is better.
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 14:38:00
Edit : Quote

tranced Posts: > 500

@qvga: how come? mono?
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 14:39:38
Edit : Quote

Aware Posts: > 500

The 1600 I have in front of me is ~4,096 colour(maybe less), not mono(looks like it came from 3510i, tbh)......

Monochrome in 1100 series is CLEARER, of course if you want to look at an image, it's not so hot - ah, no, you can't look at images(except the preloaded ones), it doesn't have bluetooth, and it doesn't support mms(a very good friend runs 1112, still no better)......




--
Posted: 2007-10-01 14:54:51
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500


On 2007-10-01 14:39:38, tranced wrote:
@qvga: how come? mono?


because its clearer and easy to see. 128x160 is far too grainy
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 14:56:20
Edit : Quote
Page <  1234>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home