General discussions : Non mobile discussion : Lets talk about the davinci code.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> Lets talk about the davinci code.
Bookmark topic
@two - I agree with you matey ! I guess you KNOW too much about the story pal
When I watched The National Geographic channel making a documentary about the Davinci Code wherein the author of the BOOK was interviewed (Dan Brown) . . . it was said that Mary Magdalene was there (Last Suffer) to assist in the distribution of food and drinks in the table . . . I am NOT doubting that Jesus will be involved with this girl . . . after all, he is ONLY human (but I believe still more of an Alien . . .) to be tempted with
!
--
Posted: 2008-01-24 15:42:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-24 15:42:07, *Jojo* wrote:
@two - I agree with you matey ! I guess you KNOW too much about the story pal
When I watched The National Geographic channel making a documentary about the Davinci Code wherein the author of the BOOK was interviewed (Dan Brown) . . . it was said that Mary Magdalene was there (Last Suffer) to assist in the distribution of food and drinks in the table . . . I am NOT doubting that Jesus will be involved with this girl . . . after all, he is ONLY human (but I believe still more of an Alien . . .) to be tempted with
!
hahaha
Hey do you know how did a princess in the past used to wear? Expensive robes mate. Look at the robe that Ms Magdalene is wering and link it to what Dan Brown said about her
Unless Iam mistaken. I think on that occasion it was when she was going to anoint jesus with perfume. Isn that an alabastar jar that she is carrying. Hmm! We may never know. This was their first meeting,
first impressions last.
A princess impressing a prince. Remember she was from the tribe of benjamin and jesus was from the tribe of david
--
Posted: 2008-01-24 16:01:42
Edit :
Quote
@two - Nice INFO ! Are you a PRIEST by profession dude
--
Posted: 2008-01-24 16:05:23
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-24 16:05:23, *Jojo* wrote:
@two - Nice INFO ! Are you a PRIEST by profession dude
lmao mate. Aprist!!
you never stop to make me laugh. No Iam not one. Im afraid they want to make me one but I dont want that sort of a duty. Iam only 22 let them give me a break so I can carry on with my analysis of religions.
My grandfather is a Priest and Iam a volleyball coach and a teacher by profession.
--
Posted: 2008-01-24 16:14:33
Edit :
Quote
@two - LOL
what are you like? - those pictures are not actual photos... the person who painted them was not there at the time... they are conjecture by human artists...
Jesus doesn't even look Jewish
- which might be a good start
As for Jesus being 'Only human'
the whole point is that he was not only human he was wholy human and wholy divine...
The marriage...
The facts are these. First, almost all scholars question whether these extra biblical gospels contain anything of value in terms of the historical Jesus. However, even if they did, the texts noted do not actually affirm that Jesus was married. In fact, the famous kiss on the lips text actually has a blank in the original manuscript right at the point where it describes where Mary was kissed. So it could be the lips or the cheek, which would simply refer to a kiss of fellowship.
http://www.thetruthaboutdavin[....]analysis-of-da-vinci-code.html
So carry on making up stories to try to mislead people if you must... but it is not a wise thing to do...
--
Posted: 2008-02-11 15:41:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-02-11 15:41:33, arvinlad wrote:
@two - LOL
what are you like? - those pictures are not actual photos... the person who painted them was not there at the time... they are conjecture by human artists...
Jesus doesn't even look Jewish
- which might be a good start
As for Jesus being 'Only human'
the whole point is that he was not only human he was wholy human and wholy divine...
The marriage...
The facts are these. First, almost all scholars question whether these extra biblical gospels contain anything of value in terms of the historical Jesus. However, even if they did, the texts noted do not actually affirm that Jesus was married. In fact, the famous kiss on the lips text actually has a blank in the original manuscript right at the point where it describes where Mary was kissed. So it could be the lips or the cheek, which would simply refer to a kiss of fellowship.
http://www.thetruthaboutdavin[....]analysis-of-da-vinci-code.html
So carry on making up stories to try to mislead people if you must... but it is not a wise thing to do...
Well mate as you can see, this is just a disscussion based on mortal and imortal concepts. Everyone is entitled to his or her own believe. As for misleading people no one did that. I think it is fair that if you dont want contribute in the disscussion you can just not click on it. Otherwise we dont mean to hurt and mislead anyone.
Just open your mind to that of an analyst.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 10:01:06
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
