>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Official Sony Ericsson T303 Discussion
Bookmark topic
er, probably not
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 11:34:22
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-03-04 11:15:30, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
Yeah true, though I don't recall it in the spy pictures.
will try and get a better pic later for ya if i can
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 12:05:04
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Cheers PK!
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 12:05:49
Edit :
Quote
looks great.the bulge might be part of the antennae maybe...
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 12:43:17
Edit :
Quote
the device looks good but a little disproportioned and the bulge at back is just disturbing, its a shame se seems to build there designs around hardware, instead of doing an effort and trying to fit hardware in an existing design, but for once they managed to have no visible screwholes !!! that's good
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 13:00:24
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
On 2008-03-04 13:00:24, not_me wrote:
...but for once they managed to have no visible screwholes !!! that's good
Hahaha

I always remember when I got my Z600i and saw the screw-holes. I thought "What the hell? They can't hide those?!"
You never know though, those SE official pictures are just photoshops, small details like screws can still appear on a production model!
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 13:03:24
Edit :
Quote
Got hands-on. It's not A200 as far as I can see it. UI in proto is damn slow. "please wait" when I opened messages. Activity menu key just opens My Shortcuts. Seems like a softkey-optimized version of the usual lowend UI, pics and short vid to follow as soon as I get home, within the next hour.
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 13:04:00
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Thought it might be. It wouldn't be hard to simply put an extra softkey into the software and take a button out.
It's a bit worrying that browsing the phone is so slow when the software (if it is the older SE software with a third softkey added) has been tried, tested and developed for a few years now!
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 13:08:48
Edit :
Quote
Pity to see that its only 128 x 160 pixels
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 13:19:12
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Well it is low end!
--
Posted: 2008-03-04 13:25:08
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply