>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Esato forum
> Esato phone selling raffle discussion
Bookmark topic
On 2008-07-03 17:36:17, F1 wrote:
On 2008-07-03 17:33:13, pmerryman wrote:
Bang it on ebay?
no its a fest of scams
Theres a few of them going on here too. Get the poll going, to see the outcome.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 17:40:57
Edit :
Quote
a poll would be good but you can't really have a poll until the method of working and rules for such raffles on Esato is established
we need to know what we're voting for...
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 17:44:23
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-03 17:32:25, F1 wrote:
my iphone is unwanted and nobody seems to want to buy a 16gb they all go for the 8gb because of the price
what are us 16gb owners ment to do?
Well, no offence mate, but its because of the price you have set, 12x25 = 300 pounds...
A new iPhone is coming out, plus the 8gb one was on sale for 169 pounds at one point... I would buy your phone, just not at that price, and I think thats the reason for the raffle, you're trying to get a price you wouldn't get otherwise, which is just taking advantage...
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 17:56:32
Edit :
Quote
Would a poll of Yes or No to the selling by raffle not be enough to start with. If a no is the outcome, then we dont need any ground rules.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 17:58:08
Edit :
Quote
yes, but perhaps people can decide better if they know how it will be run
people may simply say no because they have doubt about how it will work and people who say yes might not like how it eventually turns out that it will be run
I think we should be better informed to make our decision and we know exactly what we are voting for either way
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 18:00:09
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-03 17:44:23, masseur wrote:
a poll would be good but you can't really have a poll until the method of working and rules for such raffles on Esato is established
if the methods and rules are settled once for all, then we wouldnt need the poll anymore.
so, stablish the rules and methods

and san se acabo(saint finish)
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 18:03:05
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-03 17:56:32, RLP06 wrote:
On 2008-07-03 17:32:25, F1 wrote:
my iphone is unwanted and nobody seems to want to buy a 16gb they all go for the 8gb because of the price
what are us 16gb owners ment to do?
Well, no offence mate, but its because of the price you have set, 12x25 = 300 pounds...
A new iPhone is coming out, plus the 8gb one was on sale for 169 pounds at one point... I would buy your phone, just not at that price, and I think thats the reason for the raffle, you're trying to get a price you wouldn't get otherwise, which is just taking advantage...
so what your saying is you flammed my thread to get my phone cheaper
thanks
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 18:05:53
Edit :
Quote
I think there should be a set amount of tickets, etc
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 18:17:29
Edit :
Quote
@F1:
This is not meant against you and/or your phone, but against raffles in general, when they're only started, to get the asking price for a phone, which, as we all know, we don't get in a normal sale.
And yes, a raffle once in a while, like that with weirdwilli's Samsung is fun, but I'm against a raffle, when it's put up by the seller himself, only as a selling method, with the purpose of getting a better price.
Anyways, if and when raffles like these are put up, the seller shouldn't decide about the price, a few trusted sellers should be doing this.
[joke on] Or can I put up a raffle for my father-in-law's spare Nokia 1600, only 25 tickets at £1 ? [joke off]
edited: typo

_________________

V600i, K600i, K700i, K750i, K800i, K810i, P990i

W800i, W810i, W850i, W900i and other brands : HTC, Motorola, Nokia, Sharp, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Alcatel and Sagem.
[ This Message was edited by: Marly on 2008-07-03 20:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 18:22:03
Edit :
Quote
No, I didn't flame your thread to get your phone cheaper...
I've had 3 iPhones in the past, I can get them cheap from US friends, I just think its a little unfair to be running raffles thats all...
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 18:31:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply