>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Why is no one offering more than 256K colors
Bookmark topic
should have said, TFT screen 16M colors on their spec, and people will stop arguing
imho, 262k
color screen can compete with the likes of 16m of any other given brand at the moment, though i see no reason why
shouldn't start producing one, and see how the quality goes
pretty much the same imo
--
Posted: 2008-07-08 10:12:33
Edit :
Quote
And then new problems appear.. Why if the platform they are curently using (A200) doesn't allow this? It will need more powerful processor to handle that much information about the display...
--
Posted: 2008-07-08 11:14:30
Edit :
Quote
I do concur that the use of so-called 16m screens has a lot to do with marketing especially for Nokia. For how can so-called 256k screens "outshine" their 16m screens?
Makes no sense. Unless the difference justified it it would be otherwise, but we are yet to see this.
But then...would they really go to such lengths to mislead the public? Wouldn't it be unlawful? Or maybe their 16m are just inferior for some strange reason...
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 18:29:44
Edit :
Quote
I prefer 16m colors... i think more vivid (comparate with my K800 display)
I dont care about battery... have charger for this....
--
Posted: 2008-07-11 16:52:39
Edit :
Quote
not really much difference in screen beyond 262K, especially in less than 3" screen, unless of course you have a bionic eye which differentiate these colors.
IMHO, the important factor is the backlight and how these screen renders the colors (color saturation, contrast, sharpness, etc)
--
Posted: 2008-07-11 21:48:47
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-11 16:52:39, Guto_ViP wrote:
I prefer 16m colors... i think more vivid (comparate with my K800 display)
I dont care about battery... have charger for this....
don't compare with k800. k800 is just too washed out. there's huge difference between k800 era and latest era of SE phones.
--
Posted: 2008-07-11 22:30:14
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-11 22:30:14, Amras wrote:
On 2008-07-11 16:52:39, Guto_ViP wrote:
I prefer 16m colors... i think more vivid (comparate with my K800 display)
I dont care about battery... have charger for this....
don't compare with k800. k800 is just too washed out. there's huge difference between k800 era and latest era of SE phones.
True, my K810's display sucks big time when I compare it to the display of my mom's W890. The W890 has much more vivid colours and deeper blacks (as in, almost OLED-like-pitch-black). Currently, I believe that SE produces the best displays.
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 01:07:52
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-11 21:48:47, gavster001 wrote:
not really much difference in screen beyond 262K, especially in less than 3" screen, unless of course you have a bionic eye which differentiate these colors.
IMHO, the important factor is the backlight and how these screen renders the colors (color saturation, contrast, sharpness, etc)
I think i have bionic eyes...
On 2008-07-11 22:30:14, Amras wrote:
On 2008-07-11 16:52:39, Guto_ViP wrote:
I prefer 16m colors... i think more vivid (comparate with my K800 display)
I dont care about battery... have charger for this....
don't compare with k800. k800 is just too washed out. there's huge difference between k800 era and latest era of SE phones.
Ok, but my lasted phone has one K800 (that's why of comparasion)...
Anyway, if battery is over... i put on charger for three hours (complete charge).
_________________
Nokia 5120 -> Nokia 6120 -> SE T200 -> Motorola V800 -> SE W800 (stay with my wife) - > SE K800 (stay with my mom) -> Nokia N82 Silver -> Nokia N82 Black Edition - Firmware v20.0.062.
[ This Message was edited by: Guto_ViP on 2008-07-12 00:42 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 01:41:33
Edit :
Quote
A good example of a very sharp clear bright 16 million colour screen is the Nokia 6300. Its display is one of the best i seen. Some are better than others but i have seen fantastic 16 million ones and some 262k ones that are just as good. But for battery power i would rather have a 262k one. Though comparing a K800 next to a 6300 display the K800 looks dull.
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 02:51:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-12 02:51:00, Bonovox wrote:
A good example of a very sharp clear bright 16 million colour screen is the Nokia 6300. Its display is one of the best i seen. Some are better than others but i have seen fantastic 16 million ones and some 262k ones that are just as good. But for battery power i would rather have a 262k one. Though comparing a K800 next to a 6300 display the K800 looks dull.
6300 is not the best actually. Far from the best. Trust me. ^^
Maybe you should have seen K660 (or Z770, G502) first.
This is my friend's two month old 6300 (it's black 6300, so it's kinda new released) - and my ex-K660 (which was stolen!):
Original pic:
Original pic:
Still think 6300 is very sharp and bright?
The difference is quite huge in term of backlight brightness, and color balance (6300 is so purplish), not to mention the colors saturation and rendering, contrast, black-white point, and of course viewing angle. SE latest proprietary phones have superb viewing angle from any side.
p.s. I have also posted in another thread here couple of months ago comparison between S500 - K770 - 6120 Classic (which also one of the best Nokia's screens todays), which of course show the dominance of SE's latest displays (and the dullness of SE's displays in K800 era
).
_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...
feel free to visit my art gallery.
Macheli @DeviantArt
It'll never be proven.
Nuff said.
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-07-12 06:19 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 06:42:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
