Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : K800 vs C902 pictures please
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > K800 vs C902 pictures please Bookmark topic
Page <  123, 4 ... 151617>

datx Posts: 130

I think it's great stuff when resized pics look good..

Something my nokia 5300 can't do even when resized to 320x240 ahah

Cheers
--
Posted: 2008-08-20 22:15:49
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

you guys who say C702 have better camera then C902, please explain ????? (i dont know, but (sadly) i havnt seen so many sharp C702 pictures yet)


about the screen, i can tell C902 screen is crispy and have good brightness, (its even ok in sunshine).

ALL new more expensive phones have VERY good screens...i doubt Sonyericsson put in a dull screen on their new flagship.

some words from Mobile review:


C902 screen in darkness


_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-20 22:12 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-20 22:52:32
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

I never said there was anything wrong with the screen just its too small.
The c702's pics are perfectly sharp they look sharper than the c902s because the post-processing isnt as strong even lower light pics are still quite sharp while the c902 turns them into oilpaintings

C702 Lowish light
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13934

C702 full lowlight not sharp but its not a complete smear
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13935
--
Posted: 2008-08-20 23:33:32
Edit : Quote

PzK Posts: 35


On 2008-08-20 20:43:30, number1 wrote:
If the c902 is the phone you want then buy it, but the screen & cam quality is roughly the same quality as the k800,


ROFL, that quote made me laugh. Do you have some sort of grudge against the c902? Because I cant believe you just compared the cameras between the 2 phones.
--
Posted: 2008-08-20 23:40:23
Edit : Quote

imaticx Posts: 107

look, c702 doesn interesting me. I might buy c902, but i need to know difference between photos of K800 and c902, especially in dark (i see photos at day is beautiful and better than k800)

so, please post same picture at night from k800 and c902

thanks
--
Posted: 2008-08-20 23:51:30
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

Why not the k800 & c902 both have heavy post-processing making pic quality the same, the c902 does have better whitebalance though.

--
Posted: 2008-08-20 23:55:11
Edit : Quote

Amras Posts: > 500


On 2008-08-20 23:33:32, number1 wrote:
I never said there was anything wrong with the screen just its too small.


Small is relative. But the color reproduction is really miles better in C902.
I've seen C902 screen and it's so far, the best in bright environments (better than K660) coz light sensor doesn't work in bright environments. If only it didn't have any light sensor, it'd be the best in any environment (K660 wins in this aspect).

My point is.. it can be small, but the very vivid color reproduction really pays it off.



_________________
Some people think they are credible enough to give others critics, compliments, and stuffs. LoL!

Err.. btw.. some of the people are really into double standard, too. LoL. They don't want to be criticized, but all the time criticizes. LoL. H-I-L-A

[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-08-21 00:39 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 01:38:12
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

(i see photos at day is beautiful and better than k800)

uhh, here we go again. aren't your daylight pictures from K800 beautiful? aren't they sharp? you don't like colors? did you saw comparision of K800 and C902 pictures to say things like that? I didn't saw but I see something else - my pictures from K800 and pictures from C902 on this forum and to be honest I would like to see good reason to change my K800 to C902 because of camera

5MP over 3.2MP? well, no. small experiment by AbuBasim showed me that this doesn't mean much

better colors? no comparision = no proofs

light sensitivity? now we are talking about something! C902 sensitivity is higher. high ISO is better in C902 that's why night pictures are better and there's not much chroma noise on them but... both phones have potential to create much better very low light shots than they can. however only K800 can do this (modified driver) and C902 is awaiting for his chance

--
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:08:54
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500

wow that is some really terrible keyback light on C902
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:17:05
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

he he... you found a new thing to complain about... keep up the good work man.




he he
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 09:34 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:28:42
Edit : Quote
Page <  123, 4 ... 151617>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home