>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> C902 vs 6220 vs KC550
Bookmark topic
LOL!
my "old bulky K800" can do better low-light and night shot's than your "new and beautiful 5MP"
I smell a lot of afraid in ther air, gues whose ass is on fire...
Plank = zero arguments, zero prooves, zero credibility, nothing more than empty words and insults
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 13:31:08
Edit :
Quote
OMG, this is like watching two little children fighting over whose got the best toy! Get a life, seriously!
Can't you put a point across without calling each other names like babies? And I have to say Plank, you really do yourself no favours at all. Those pics you have posted with flash, even at the cropped size you post them in, have terrible loss of detail and massive amounts of noise.
The C902 is a great snapper outdoors, but indoors, it's awful.
And the funniest part of the review by far for me was looking at how tiny the C902 screen is compared to the others! It looks ridiculous. Those blue touch areas are a waste of time anyway. Just another gimmick.
[ This Message was edited by: marty mcfly on 2008-08-25 12:39 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 13:34:15
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-25 13:14:31, Raiderski wrote:
pathetic^2
More like pathetic^7 or something.
On 2008-08-25 13:16:45, Vipera ammodytes wrote:
FULL SIZE planky of that pictures, you cant nothing proove with resized pictures.
According to plank, you can proove everything with his pics. Well everything except bad quality on c902.
On 2008-08-25 13:20:25, plankgatan wrote:
(dont you get it ??? your k800 is out of businees...what do you really know about this phones ???? nothing)
More than you, it seems..
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 13:34:30
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
here we go again
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 13:37:28
Edit :
Quote
he he... very strange that a review writen by one of the world biggest Digital magazins gave C902 10 of 10.
but hey...wait a minute..... some lonely guy from Asia (somewhere) give C902 the worse points ever......who is right ???? who have most knowledge ???
(probably this Asian guy...or ???)
like bahraini says.. its amazing that LG won ??? LG pics looks most crappy of all. the only LG pic who looks nice, is ISO.800
(i can bet that guy own a LG himslef)
i would rather say 6220 had most nice pics, with C902 right after...thats my opponion......
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-25 12:52 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 13:45:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-25 01:05:41, Dextrr wrote:
I, actually, am anxiously waiting for Plank's replies to this thread. He's my daily source of laughter.
There is a reason people write this Plank. Single handed, you have burst in and turned this thread into a pathetic name calling exercise. If you have a point to make, please make it without calling this person and that person names like a child.
This is supposed to be a discussion forum, not a classroom. Personally I really hate it when you turn up because you just ruin all the threads with this childish behaviour. Call me all the names under the sun after this if you want, I don't care. I have much broader shoulders than yourself.
I'm just saying what everyone else thinks. I've got nothing more to say on this thread because it's now lost it's point.
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 13:55:13
Edit :
Quote
but please. just see what some people write (wrote)... he didnt have the ball to keep it like it was, so he erased it..whatever).
im not care if people like Vipera, etc, say stuff about me.....thats just fine, and really, i actaully think some of this guys are complaining morons, (because they just complain about nearlly everyting...but if they are happy with that..its fine)....
but the most important is that i dont call all other people hard names. am not that rude.
edit.
last thing...i dont get it... how can a camera who have this image-quality get lowest scores ??? (its just weird)
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-25 13:28 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 14:06:25
Edit :
Quote
let's have some fun...
but the most important is that i dont call all other people hard names. am not that rude
ohhh...
i actaully think some of this guys are complaining morons
is this a lie?
how can a camera who have this image-quality get lowest scores ?
you don't get it? they have the same mentality like you. they don't like C902 as you don't like K800, for them your C902 "is out of businees". you have right to say that K800 is crap but they don't have any right to say that C902 is crap? just awesome...
you still just talking & complaining.
no, only you just talking. pictures can say much more than your empty words. complaining? do you know what this word mean? complaining on what for example? no example? more and more empty words and insults
marty mcfly
isn't this strange? all I want to see is full size pic from C902 in low-light conditions, that's all
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-25 14:05 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 14:41:02
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-25 14:41:02, Raiderski wrote:
isn't this strange? all I want to see is full size pic from C902 in low-light conditions, that's all
I second that but its best to not say anything for so many reasons.
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 15:06:37
Edit :
Quote
last thing...i dont get it... how can a camera who have this image-quality get lowest scores ??? (its just weird)
its not strange, you have pictures in full size from 4 phones, and its a visible from a plane that c902 have worsest image quality, that is reality
you posted again same image??? you posted that image in about 4 topics...
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 15:16:22
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
