Esato Mobile
General discussions : Other manufacturers : LG phones voted as most unreliable
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Other manufacturers > LG phones voted as most unreliable Bookmark topic
Page <  123

Dups! Posts: > 500


On 2009-04-08 06:31:39, Bhavv wrote:
Well, my K850i used to turn itself off a lot, had to be replaced, and still had to be returned for servicing 3 times.

My LG Arena however is so far completely flawless.

So my personal conclusion is that LG are more reliable then SE.


Your conclusion is completely flawed! You can't judge LG based on 1 phone that you own, it is all about their portfolio.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 11:19:55
Edit : Quote

anonymuser Posts: > 500

Be fair, clearly Bhavv is in the most authorative position to judge this, he's owned his Arena almost a week now..
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 11:26:17
Edit : Quote

Dups! Posts: > 500


On 2009-04-08 11:26:17, Boinng wrote:
Be fair, clearly Bhavv is in the most authorative position to judge this, he's owned his Arena almost a week now..



Lol
Yes, I forgot.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 14:09:32
Edit : Quote

Bonovox Posts: > 500

Well i have owned about 4 LG phones and all have been bad reliability wise. But i have heard they are improving hearing less complaints recently compared to some manufacturers lol Its not that i hate LG phones god some are amazing but just need to be sure if i buy again. The Arena is nice.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 17:32:00
Edit : Quote

se_love Posts: > 500

Well this is interesting. But Nokias more reliable then SE's? I call bull. My dad so far owned 5-6 different Nokias and I must say they werent exactly the best. But my SEs on the other hand worked fine. Except my W760. My god it turning off every 2 hours was unbearable.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 19:56:39
Edit : Quote

Rookwise Posts: > 500

Bhavv isn't the only one to have bought an LG recently. I've owned a Renoir for nearly 2 weeks now and while running O2's software I had a lot of reboots but since debranding it the phone has been lots more stable. Build quality is a lot better than any recent SE phone released.

This message was posted from a LG
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 21:27:04
Edit : Quote

Bonovox Posts: > 500

I would say Nokia are not as bad as SE lately all i hear is complaints about SE though i prefer SE phones still. SE used to be most reliable than anyone. But i will say my month old c510 is very reliable.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 22:18:00
Edit : Quote

dizzybee Posts: 234

LG's UI seems a bit laggy, I don't think they're as good as SE.
--
Posted: 2009-04-16 00:24:11
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500


On 2009-03-20 21:21:00, Bonovox wrote:
Ah good thanks for the link could not do a link from my phone.


its actaully easier then it looks.

when you see that link (on your mobile screen)....just press "alt" - browse to - "copy/paste in" - copy the link - paste inside your Esato post - Done
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
about LGs "unspecified problems". i surely agree that LG have specific issues with their high end mobile cameras. (if you compare to other brands).

im talking about BAD auto settings. (on the last two camera tests (here on esato). both Secret and Renoir FAILED completely with auto focus and auto whitebalance.

ps. LG (i mean LG Philips ) should stick with their LCD screens, there they at least are top in the world

--
Posted: 2009-04-17 12:51:32
Edit : Quote

OluYom Posts: > 500

The KS360 is my first LG. It is generally stable, but I've had my fair share of spontaneous reboots.

This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2009-05-15 04:59:09
Edit : Quote
Page <  123

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home