>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> What is your main camera?
Bookmark topic
On 2009-04-16 19:12:54, thomas93 wrote:
seeing as having my DSLR with me constantly would make me look a complete berk
i use a Panasonic FS3
Tell me about it. Bet yours doesn't go bu-DUNK every time you take a photo.
THAT, that gets looks.
--
Posted: 2009-04-16 20:04:10
Edit :
Quote
I have had for a while the Sony DSC N1 8.1 mega pixel camera. Love it. Pictures are so bright and sharp and its so reliable
--
Posted: 2009-04-16 20:20:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-16 14:56:15, masseur wrote:
I keep looking at the latest DSLR's but I know from past experience that if its not pocketable, then it'll just sit at home
@masseur - a POCKETABLE - DSLR
H m m m . . . is there a DSLR out in the market at present that is just AS big as that of a POINT-and-SHOOT
Well anyways . . . I'm starting to get acquainted with an Olympus E-500 (8 MP) . . . and a Pentax Optio M50 for a point-and-shoot
Here's a digicam-site that masseur referred me to some years ago that is truly worth browsing at when it comes to looking for a potential camera-buy . . .
www.dpreview.com
--
Posted: 2009-04-16 21:01:32
Edit :
Quote
I use a Canon SD400 5mpx camera.
I want to buy a DSLR but i think i have to learn a little bit more about photography before.
But i think i'll buy it before crhistmas, it will be a D40.
ah and another thing is i take much more photos with my phone than with my cam
--
Posted: 2009-04-16 21:57:00
Edit :
Quote
Any camera is just a means to an end, the end being an image, whats important is that you are taking pictures not what you are using to do so!
Chasing technology and mp`s wont enable you to take "better" pictures it will just empty your bank account ;-(
If YOU take a pic and YOU like what YOU see then evrything else is irrelevant
--
Posted: 2009-04-16 23:25:14
Edit :
Quote
@street - Oh yeah .. and I do AGREE with your thoughts here . . . I remembera story in the past wherein a PROFESSIONAL photographer was given a low-end digicam brand while a NOVICE was handed a high-end brand, they took the very objects . . . at then end, images captured with that of the PRO-Photographer was much better than those taken by the NOVICE participant . . .
It all ends up with the PROPER settings . . .
--
Posted: 2009-04-17 00:47:30
Edit :
Quote
...which really proves nothing except that a NOVICE can mess up the settings ON a PROFESSIONAL camera as they don't KNOW what they are doing, whereas a PROFESSIONAL can make the BEST use of THE settings on ANY camera BECAUSE they know WHAT they are doing regarding light, exposure, framing etc ETC etc:-) btw, did I emphasise the right words?
--
Posted: 2009-04-17 01:01:20
Edit :
Quote
Korak !
*Translation : Correct !
--
Posted: 2009-04-17 01:05:32
Edit :
Quote
Thanks everyone...
@*Jojo* - masseur said that " that if its not pocketable, " not that there was a POCKETABLE - DSLR
but I think everyone got that.
Lots of great comments to make me think.
I remember buying an SLR camera many many years back, and extra lenses but on a 36 roll of film, I only took 5 good shots.
Yes, it was my lack of understanding... ;-(
So I am thinking of simplicity with operation and hopefully, if my eye is good for a photo, then great results.
Ofiaich
--
Posted: 2009-04-17 01:44:53
Edit :
Quote
@ofiaich - Maybe masseur meant "POCKETABLE" - figuratively
or literally
Oh whatever it is . . . there is NO available DSLR out in the market that can FIT in your trouser's pockets
--
Posted: 2009-04-17 02:06:24
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
