>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> c902 vs Canon Ixus 85is
Bookmark topic
I didn´t have the intent of a flame war with his thread thats for sure
Ofcourse one of the cheapest digicams out there can´t compare with professional photo equipment and dslr:s but that wasn´t really the point here. For me the difference in photo quality between the c902 and Ixus are lightyears but i sure understand that they aren´t the best in the world.
I will be very happy with it and it suits my needs. It slips down easily in my jeans pocket and i don´t have to use a backpack for a 100 mile hike to carry around the cam.
I have own bigger cams before but already with the Canon Powershot A640 it feels so big. You cant carry it around that easy and i know i have missed many shots just because of this.
The intent was to show how much better (less worse) a small cheap digicam is today compared to a cellphone and at the same time show that for some people it won´t matter at all. It all has to do with our different taste and needs.
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 08:06:43
Edit :
Quote
how thick is c902 camera ???(maybe 6-8mm with the lens), and produce similar pics as both A640 and ixus85 in normal size....thats pretty good.
and thats how you can compare it, you cant compare with some larger digi cams, (ixus85 have real moving, optical lenses and is of course a bit thicker, but still quite thin)....
anyway, if you want a great slim camera...buy a DSC-T1....its really cool (best 5m.p. i've tried)
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 08:24:44
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-26 00:37:12, plankgatan wrote:
oh my.... first i thought you kidding, but then i release you didnt.
Hasselblad 503CW and all other medium formats cameras suxs outside the studio ??
edit....why even bother, but what a heck:
.....have you ever seen the result from a 503cw after you develop the film straight ahead ??? (im talking about analogue now, not some boring digi-format)
edit...
back to topic...my former DSC-T1 is the best slim camera i have. its a bit better then ixus-85, (not way better)...so i really think its ok quality on your ixus and c902 for its size
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-25 23:58 ]
Of course I've seen images shot with medium format cameras, and the cameras are extremely limited. And don't even get started with the whole analogue versus digital - digital won that battle several years ago.
On 2009-04-26 03:01:26, davidtre wrote:
On 2009-04-25 23:54:11, Mizzle wrote:
that doesn't mean that there are other and better options available.
That is to say that the same reasoning can be valid with your “professional equipment”
Obviously that should have said "that there aren't".
@plankgatan
FFS man, "normal size" is full size! I'm sick and tired of hearing your ramblings about "normal sizes" and how thin a camera is.
About your comment on "real moving optics" - any autofocus camera will have that.
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 09:34:23
Edit :
Quote
A Nikon D700 is only 1500 pounds... if it didnt take better pictures than a small 150 pound digicam I'd get my money back Mizzle
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-04-26 10:46 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 11:43:32
Edit :
Quote
@blerk
So, are you already using an N95 8GB now?
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 11:59:52
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-26 11:43:32, blerk wrote:
A Nikon D700 is only 1500 pounds... if it didnt take better pictures than a small 150 pound digicam I'd get my money back Mizzle
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-04-26 10:46 ]
Good thing it does then
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 12:16:29
Edit :
Quote
I actually laughed upon reading this thread xD
Mizzle says they both suck, and everyone gets offended.
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 12:21:17
Edit :
Quote
hardly offended by that, but i thought he was way out fishing when he said that ex, 503CW just looks good in a studio ??? (more weird then so can it hardly be)
we develop 503CW films (straight ahead) quite often, and they are amazing, just amazing
besides, i think this ixus-85 photos looks pretty good in fullsize, (seen worse, for sure).
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 16:13:07
Edit :
Quote
The cannon a470 is a great cam at only 50GBP
http://www.digitalcamerarevie[....]80&review=Canon+Powershot+A470
check the fullsized samples , dam good quality for 50quid.
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 16:19:49
Edit :
Quote
Here's a sample from my 5 year old p100
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19334
It's good enough for me.
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 17:06:55
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
