Esato Mobile
General discussions : General : Das-(5 MegaPixel)-Kampf
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > General > Das-(5 MegaPixel)-Kampf Bookmark topic
Page <  123

plankgatan Posts: > 500

qvga. as you say, it might be some sort of issue with that N95..frankly i dont care.

I CARE ABOUT HOW BAD N95 PRODUCE CERTAIN COLOURS.......and thats something you NEVER can talk away...same shit as inside this shoot-out:
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=184936&start=0

BLUE VS BROWN/BLUE
C902



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-17 09:46 ]

--
Posted: 2009-05-17 10:44:39
Edit : Quote

mario2004 Posts: > 500

@Plak You only can deceive so much . . . and no more . . . Keep in mind, some people in here played with cameras while you were still leaning to walk - literarely ! However, one weakness you manage to highlight in the c902, is the narrower lens angle. Why on earth SE f-up so big, is beyond logical thinking. Check how the field of view is smaller in your 'test pics'. Especially the first ones. And you are comparing to a 2006 model. I thought those N95 were of the market by now. That shows again how good nokia with the n95 was. Well ahead of its time. On the net there are countless 'photo contests' between different cells and the n95 resolution/lens combination is unbeatable. Even myself get sometimes confused which 6x4 printed photos, have been taken with my n95-8gig and which with my canon. And how is the VIDEO of your c902? I bet you won't bother N95-RULES
--
Posted: 2009-05-17 11:54:56
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500

PINK/PURPLE VS RED
C902


N95


--
Posted: 2009-05-17 13:07:43
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

mario , i have maybe upload 1-2 "real" camera shoot outs here on Esato, thats pretty small i think. why i choose c902 is because its my current phone for the moment..... pretty obvious i guess.


besides, have guys any idea how insane slow N95 camera response time is ???? (i reckon 3-4 sec something (every review on earth confirm that)).
a camera with such looong response time have a bigger chance to miscalculate its focus...thats for sure.



--
Posted: 2009-05-17 14:16:29
Edit : Quote

sowbran Posts: 158

The response time is because is symbian and haver many options and programs, and the A2 doesn have nothing lol and remember that A2 dont read pdf,doc,xls while symbian read it very good.


On 2009-05-17 14:16:29, plankgatan wrote:
mario , i have maybe upload 1-2 "real" camera shoot outs here on Esato, thats pretty small i think. why i choose c902 is because its my current phone for the moment..... pretty obvious i guess.


besides, have guys any idea how insane slow N95 camera response time is ???? (i reckon 3-4 sec something (every review on earth confirm that)).
a camera with such looong response time have a bigger chance to miscalculate its focus...thats for sure.



--
Posted: 2009-05-17 19:43:40
Edit : Quote

King9 Posts: 53


On 2009-05-16 21:40:17, plankgatan wrote:
I'm helping my little-brother to sell his N95. before that, I snap some pics on a "Loppis" today.

all pics is auto, just opened the camera____pointed & shot........
(N95 had "problems" to get all pics sharp, otherwise it worked good)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-17 01:03 ]




It's fairly obvious this photos is out of focus. Movements with a camera gives curved lines all over the photo.
You right about one thing by the way, the sky looks kind of dirty with N95, not good at all.
--
Posted: 2009-05-18 11:11:31
Edit : Quote

blerk Posts: > 500


On 2009-05-17 10:30:52, plankgatan wrote:
woaahhh, you guys are the most naive, jealous people i ever seen. you think i cheated ????? he he

besides, its not the first time C902 have better colours, sharpness then N95....
wait a minute, HE LIED TO, CALL THE POLICE, (he lied with his god damn Tripod... he he)
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=184936&start=0


Lol, I would not lie about that. I used a tripod and a big chunk of bluetack to stick the phones to the tripod. But my photo's are in focus. Maybe the lens was dirty or old firmware or something.
--
Posted: 2009-05-19 12:05:00
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500


On 2009-05-19 12:05:00, blerk wrote:
Maybe the lens was dirty or old firmware or something.

Yeah, right...
--
Posted: 2009-05-19 16:48:13
Edit : Quote
Page <  123

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home