>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> C902 vs N95-1
Bookmark topic
hahaha its only in your opinion. you have a bad cam module.
--
Posted: 2009-09-23 14:15:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-09-23 14:15:07, mrjulius wrote:
hahaha its only in your opinion. you have a bad cam module.
lol, this is pathetic, If you do not have anything smart to say, dont say nothing.
and please dont link resized photos.
--
Posted: 2009-09-23 14:50:42
Edit :
Quote
ok blah blah.. la. la. la. i w0nt say anything
--
Posted: 2009-09-23 14:56:18
Edit :
Quote
http://www.smape.com/en/reviews/nokia/Nokia_6220_classic-rev.html
Scroll the link down until you reach the comparison between Nokia 6220c and C902.
I really doubt that his camera is also faulty...
Edit:
More photos to compare N95 and C902!
All in auto (flash off):
C902:
N95 (has that stange light because a car was passing by):
C902:
N95:
C902:
N95:
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-24 00:53 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-23 22:43:47
Edit :
Quote
@zide
You might wanna compare more than just between a blurry picture and a sharp picture to prove your point. As it is, they're not good comparison shots. Shoot your objects on timer, then we'll see.
--
Posted: 2009-09-24 03:00:24
Edit :
Quote
Both phones have crap cameras anyway, but its true N95 has been a better performer hands down when comparing it with C902. PF or NR, Sharpening or Oil Painting Effect those are lame excuses for a camera phone dubbed to be the best (also its a shame to award N95 the best 5mp by TIPA afterall when the reason is that its the only 5mp available on the market that time) i would instead go for C901 or any Samsung 5mp phones if image quality is considered, even 6700 is a worthy one
--
Posted: 2009-09-24 05:36:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-09-24 03:00:24, mode wrote:
@zide
You might wanna compare more than just between a blurry picture and a sharp picture to prove your point. As it is, they're not good comparison shots. Shoot your objects on timer, then we'll see.
All those shoots were taken by my hands and, steady or not, the conditions were the same for both. That would be another problem if C902 can't handle a minor hand move (I was pretty still but I am not a statue a statue...).
Thats not the problem though, to make that clear I've also taken comparison shots with the timer... And the result is this:
C902:
N95:
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-24 18:10 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-24 17:55:55
Edit :
Quote
Where's Plank when you need him?
--
Posted: 2009-09-25 02:11:15
Edit :
Quote
crossmatched Posts: > 500
the only bad thing about n95 (and 6220, n82) is the overly aggressive jpeg compression.
amount of resolved details are lower compared to the competition..
imagine a 5mp pic of 600-700kb ave file size?
--
Posted: 2009-09-25 02:41:51
Edit :
Quote
After seeing these images I have to say I expected more from a C902... And I may be overdoing it, but this makes me so pleased I got a C901 instead of any of the two as they were options also.
--
Posted: 2009-09-25 03:51:20
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
