Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Mobile Review trashes the new SE phones yet again
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Mobile Review trashes the new SE phones yet again
Bookmark topic
I know. And while he could mention the strong points (Satio: Camera, Aino: Music, Pureness: hm, none), there's hardly anything wrong with his critizised weaknesses.
--
Posted: 2009-12-28 12:51:14
Edit :
Quote
Titus
IMO Eldar is showing signs of frustration over SE, as they have HUGE AMOUNTS OF POTENTIAL and are simply waisting it. I remember Boinng highlighting how powerful SE realy could be if they could just communicate well and join forces with their other departments, sorry i cant find the correct words but im sure you know what i mean. SE realy have all the resources to be number 1,but they just dont seem to realise it and keep repeating past mistakes, it realy is just frustrating to see that.
--
Posted: 2009-12-28 13:18:37
Edit :
Quote
well said Gucci
--
Posted: 2009-12-28 13:20:51
Edit :
Quote
clearly biased against se i wonder how people can still read biased reviews like that....personally i rather stick to decent sites like gsm arena etc where they give relatively unbiased views on every handsets whether it be lg or sony or nokia.
and yet a year or two ago i remember mobile review used to be decent and straight...say what you want a white aino looks better than an n97 anyday
--
Posted: 2009-12-28 13:34:23
Edit :
Quote
Dude!!! This is insane. you guys are acting as if Eldar is the godfather of SE or something. Ist the W9965 a good product? Isnt it a bestseller? But no, eldar calls it a PR product which is overpriced and sucks. What i mean to say, SE, however bad it may be, has its upsides which Eldar doesnt try to impress upon.According to him, every product of SE is a piece of shit which is not the case. If you think that a compnay cant stand itself up with negative publicity alone, i really dont know you are getting at. Encouraging a guy like Eldar and actually joining hands with him over his bullcrap is pure stupidity. If Eldar had started something like this over Nokia, i dont think anyone here would have sided with him.
--
Posted: 2009-12-28 14:10:25
Edit :
Quote
Who gives a sod if someone hates
as long as we are happy & we like them who the hell cares
--
Posted: 2009-12-28 14:19:15
Edit :
Quote
being frustrated is one thing BUT holding a grudge is another...that man has a truckload. And I could still remember that he wrote a separate article about the Nokia 5800 on earlier days about it's flaws and he even states that one shouldn't be hamper of getting one despite of those. And I'm like 'what the hell was that?' One would might ask..is Nokia compensating Eldar? Or was SE compensating him before? From hindsight was it just about 'Envelopemental Journalism?'
[ This Message was edited by: titus1 on 2009-12-28 14:36 ]
--
Posted: 2009-12-28 15:00:58
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-12-28 14:19:15, Bonovox wrote:
Who gives a sod if someone hates
as long as we are happy & we like them who the hell cares
If one with a huge site like that is biased it could have an effect on sales, wich in the end matters to us customers.
If S-E makes less money, they can work on SW´s for less time for example, or have to raise the prices..?
Mostly it´s a matter of principles, if you have a site like that, you´ve got to be UNbiased!!
My Satio worked great, as do my current Aino.
Video I´ve made on the Satio:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcxsWfoQ65Q 
/M
--
Posted: 2009-12-30 13:53:53
Edit :
Quote
People can make up their own minds and also try products out. If i was reading that i would ignore it.
--
Posted: 2009-12-30 15:20:00
Edit :
Quote
reviews through the websites are done by the website personnel or someone who is purposely picked for certain purposes ie politically, emotionally, "get paid to review" etc, generally speaking. the reviews not in any way necessary represents the whole truth of a product anatomy or feeling of the consumers across the globe if it is a "paid reviews". more than often reviews are done in a strategic manner to undermine certain products because of the "get paid review" situation and thus lead to a bias reviews....worst still if the reviewer is just a plain reviewer without any strong technical know how knowledge or hands-on experience on the said product just merely based on "scripts" prepared by the party concerned...
the real and only true reviewers are the consumers, btw haven't SE won any EISA awards....owh a bunch of them the latest was W995.
--
Posted: 2009-12-30 16:45:09
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
