Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : sony ericsson versus normal digi cam ?
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > sony ericsson versus normal digi cam ? Bookmark topic
Page <  1234>

mode Posts: > 500


On 2010-01-04 23:10:33, larry 68 wrote:
I have a 10mp Panasonic Lumix and there is no camera phone capable of taking anything near the quality it produces.

Lumix does have a reputation to be the best compact out there, knocking out other imaging heavyweights
--
Posted: 2010-01-05 01:20:04
Edit : Quote

carkitter Posts: > 500


On 2010-01-04 00:26:49, mode wrote:
Plank is known to be biased (sorry mate), no doubt about that

Don't you mean that Plankgatan is often accused of being biased, as his results differ from the outlandish claims made by others?

That Pentax certainly seems to provide pics that are less focused than the C902. I think Plankgatan has made his point.
camphones provide very good results in the right hands. It doesn't surprise me that in some aspects thay may be catching up to some digicams.
--
Posted: 2010-01-05 01:23:21
Edit : Quote

mrjulius Posts: > 500

hehehe
c902 beats a pentax that so many lens

pentax optio S5n
[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2010-01-05 00:43 ]

--
Posted: 2010-01-05 01:42:21
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

the lens is perfectly clean on the Pentax cam, (im not that vain)

like i said, it produce wonderful flash pics....but in full auto the C902 beats in sharpness.

flash by Pentax....image are clean & sharp and perfect.
(daughter new baby dog (its big for a baby...he he)
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

guess i use this one for indoor/flash and the C902 for outdoor

ps.....i had a Sony digi cam who blew every phones back to stoneage....but thats a expensive digi cam...this ordinary cams are not that good i think in auto.
i can adjust the settings on the Pentax cam and it will of course get better....so its not some bad camera.

edit.
ever heard about EXIF data ?????
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2010-01-05 10:54 ]

--
Posted: 2010-01-05 11:44:39
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

Pentax model name is ... ?
--
Posted: 2010-01-05 11:53:28
Edit : Quote

fluke9 Posts: 461


On 2010-01-02 18:20:22, Bonovox wrote:
Plank bloody hell that Pentax is shit!!!!!!!!! How many mega pixels is the Pentax? C902 is far better I my C902
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2010-01-02 17:21 ]



1
--
Posted: 2010-01-05 14:00:20
Edit : Quote

mriley Posts: > 500


On 2010-01-05 01:23:21, carkitter wrote:

On 2010-01-04 00:26:49, mode wrote:
Plank is known to be biased (sorry mate), no doubt about that

Don't you mean that Plankgatan is often accused of being biased, as his results differ from the outlandish claims made by others?




Nikon D80 vs C902
[ This Message was edited by: mriley on 2010-01-05 17:34 ]

--
Posted: 2010-01-05 14:42:15
Edit : Quote

carkitter Posts: > 500

I'm confused, is that link to support your statement or mine?
--
Posted: 2010-01-08 05:32:44
Edit : Quote

mriley Posts: > 500

its backing mode's point
--
Posted: 2010-01-08 08:58:21
Edit : Quote

asmyl Posts: 53

Cheap digicam are shit, my olympus FE3010 always produce bad image. Only DSLR can make it, so when compare camera phone with compact digicam, sure some cameraphone may be better. See here: http://reviews.cnet.com/digit[....]_7-33529354.html?tag=mncol;lst
--
Posted: 2010-01-12 10:10:51
Edit : Quote
Page <  1234>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home