Manufacturer Discussion : Apple : Post your pics and videos taken on the iPhone 4
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Apple
> Post your pics and videos taken on the iPhone 4
Bookmark topic
That's better but no I have a proper camera I was just saying they looked poor
--
Posted: 2010-06-25 23:01:58
Edit :
Quote
On 2010-06-25 21:55:02, Bonovox wrote:
It looks like VGA quality
Terrible but I guess photography is not what the iphone is all about.
Compare masseur's full size garden shot using the iPhone 4 with your garden shot using an SE Elm:
To me the iPhone 4 seems to handle details better. Compare the wooden fence in both shots. The Elm takes out some detail due to noise reduction. The color tone is different. Masseur's shot seems to have been taken on an overcast day, whereas bonovox' shot was taken in a little more light (hint: overexposed flowers in the foreground).
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2010-06-25 22:19 ]
--
Posted: 2010-06-25 23:13:49
Edit :
Quote
--
Posted: 2010-06-25 23:23:06
Edit :
Quote
I think masseur did a mistake posting full size photos. Most people here are not 'pixel peppers' and don't care about panning and zooming while looking at photos. (I promise to not do the same myself from now on.
)
And Apple were clever not to post sample photos taken in less than perfect light as masseur did here. Speaking of which, I'd say the same about Nokia's coming fancycamera, the N8. We'll see how good (or bad!) that phone really is only when camphone reviews and users start posting their own photos taken with it.
--
Posted: 2010-06-26 07:59:32
Edit :
Quote
[ This Message was edited by: mriley on 2010-10-16 09:52 ]
--
Posted: 2010-06-26 12:53:07
Edit :
Quote
No if you see pictures looking like that full size its awful sorry. And your comparison was daft the Elm has much better details. All I see is noise and poor details not much sharpness. Also the bottom left of the garden shot is over exposed with a touch of purple fringing
--
Posted: 2010-06-26 13:22:00
Edit :
Quote
@masseur & voda john
Could you upload pics @1024 x 765 resolution?
The 3GS photos weren't that sharp either, I guess thats just Apple
--
Posted: 2010-06-26 13:28:55
Edit :
Quote
i agree with bonovox. The elm takes better pics. For such a overpriced phone, the pics are quite poor.
--
Posted: 2010-06-26 13:30:00
Edit :
Quote
@bonovox,
Reading quickly I thought it was your Elm shot you were talking about and I was about to agree but then I read your post again. We all have different tastes and opinions. I prefer a camera to not apply too much post-processing. Elm does quite a bit of that. Look at the black edges around your over-exposed dandelions. That's excessive sharpening.
The N6700 shots you were posting before were much better than from the Elm and better than the iPhone 4.
@mriley,
Agreed but most people don't usually see the full photos and when printed at typical sizes (for example 4x6"), the noise you see at full size will not be apparent. So no need for waxwork.
I also feel a bit disappointed with the iPhone 4 camera. Definitely noisier than the 3GS's camera.
One guy on Flickr posted a comparison here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbuchanan/sets/72157624228235507/[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2010-06-26 12:49 ]
--
Posted: 2010-06-26 13:35:22
Edit :
Quote
I think I am going to stay off this thread now before all iphone 4 fans start throwing things at me
Bye
--
Posted: 2010-06-26 13:58:14
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
