>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Xperia P discussion thread
Bookmark topic
I like the design a high end materials. Shame they couldn't do the same with the S. If this had HD display id be all over it. I'll wait to see what is to come end of Q3. For the record, I love the red.
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 02:48:11
Edit :
Quote
I'll just leave this pic from Engadget here...
Hubba hubba
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 03:26:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-02-26 21:53:35, motvikt wrote:
On 2012-02-26 21:08:52, Prom1 wrote:
Why did sony NOT put a 720P front camera like the Xperia S?!
This is a premium product and they went with NFC but no HD front camera but VGA?! YUCK!!!
Who cares about the front camera
I do! The only reason I still use my iOS devices is it's better for video conferencing. I hardly use the "phone" functions at all... everything I do is over Facetime, Tango, or Skype... although I might just ditch Tango and Skype for Google Talk's video function.
The front cam on my xperia ray is just sad.... very very sad.... like Yahoo-Video-chat-webcam-from-the-90's sad.
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 04:40:32
Edit :
Quote
i think this is a great move by sony to release an aluminum unibody phone ahead of apple's rumored aluminum unibody iphone5. of course, they should have stuffed higher specs into it, made it a little bigger, and put a competitive price tag on it. higher specs being larger screen with HD resolution, 12 mp camera, faster processor (dual core is fine). If they did, it would be the #1 best seller of the year, hands down.
btw did someone answer the whitemagic v. HD resolution question? are they mutually exclusive?
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 04:41:14
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-02-26 21:53:35, motvikt wrote:
On 2012-02-26 21:08:52, Prom1 wrote:
Why did sony NOT put a 720P front camera like the Xperia S?!
This is a premium product and they went with NFC but no HD front camera but VGA?! YUCK!!!
Who cares about the front camera
I care! I'll be doing a lot more Skype calls - 3/day - for work communications or through Cisco unity vc calls. Since I'm black and have slightly uneven skin tones that really show in pictures this matters to me.
Cameras where never invented to match dark skin; nor was the lighting ever considered that. HD would help show my skin tones better so I'm concerned.
I get the sense the "P" = Premium but Sny left out the premium features.
Other than that -my personal concern - this is a FINE product!
Sony is off to a good start!!
Twin stereo speakers is something I've wanted in a phone, let alone a smartphone for a very long time!
[ This Message was edited by: Prom1 on 2012-02-27 03:53 ]
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 04:51:32
Edit :
Quote
I suppose if I happened to be on a tight budget and didn't care too much about having a high end device, this phone would be ideal.
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 10:03:41
Edit :
Quote
I don't like the direction Sony is going. We have S, it has regular LCD, 32GB and 12 MPx. Then goes P with cool display but, camera is 8MPx and 13GB of available storage, so it's not really a phone for demanding user. Then goes U with ridicolous small memory of 4GB, 5MPx camera, but it has cool colour changing strip.
This is why SE failed, software restrictions and poor hardware choices. I mean, this colourful bottom is the same as in P and S, why is it only available in U? To make it selling point. The question is, why they didn't enable it in S and P? Because they want You to buy more, or change a lot. Now this is a pure software case, which will be implemented by XDA-developers to S and P. This will anger Sony, and the nice cooperation with XDA that SE accomplished will fall.
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2012-02-27 10:34 ]
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 11:33:02
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-02-27 11:33:02, admad wrote:
I don't like the direction Sony is going.
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2012-02-27 10:34 ]
Also to me it looks a bit too much SE politics ...
I do not like the idea that they all look the same only size is different...not only that as smaller it gets so more basic it is
(like putting HDMI to big screen phones and no HDMI for phone with little screen...)
NO I want my next mini with a Quad Core processor!
and best screen avelible and HDMI port and I do not mind to pay for it (much)more but I wat a small TOP phone.
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 12:54:48
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-02-27 12:54:48, pt020 wrote:
On 2012-02-27 11:33:02, admad wrote:
I don't like the direction Sony is going.
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2012-02-27 10:34 ]
Also to me it looks a bit too much SE politics ...
I do not like the idea that they all look the same only size is different...not only that as smaller it gets so more basic it is
(like putting HDMI to big screen phones and no HDMI for phone with little screen...)
NO I want my next mini with a Quad Core processor!
and best screen avelible and HDMI port and I do not mind to pay for it (much)more but I wat a small TOP phone.
Let me ask you somthing.
What is the differed between dualcore in a mini and a quadcore in a mini with both 3.5 screen? What for use has it more than a dualcore? Are you just a gimmick type of just a person who just want that the phone run smooth.
Look at the ArcS and Samsung GS2 use 1.2 dualcore CPU and almost running the same as the Arc S.
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 13:03:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-02-27 13:03:00, worf1000 wrote:
Let me ask you somthing.
What is the differed between dualcore in a mini and a quadcore in a mini with both 3.5 screen? What for use has it more than a dualcore? Are you just a gimmick type of just a person who just want that the phone run smooth.
Look at the ArcS and Samsung GS2 use 1.2 dualcore CPU and almost running the same as the Arc S.
In the past Sony made the smallest and advanced walkman ,discman,minidisc and so on ..that was the idea to make them the smallest they can but load it with technology,that is wat made Sony's good name ... it did not come from cheap copies of bigger brothers
[ This Message was edited by: pt020 on 2012-02-27 21:19 ]
--
Posted: 2012-02-27 13:19:40
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
