Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Which Ericsson phone do you think should be in the hall of fame?
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Which Ericsson phone do you think should be in the hall of fame?
Bookmark topic
GH - series
but also agree with a lot of others about the T39.
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 00:05:00
Edit :
Quote
I also think that the T39 should be in the hall-o-fame. (Wasn't it the first to feature bluetooth?)
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 00:19:00
Edit :
Quote
T68i Forever!!!
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 00:49:00
Edit :
Quote
R380:-), R520:-), T28;-), T39:-D, T68:-D
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 00:54:00
Edit :
Quote
t68i & t39 b/c t68i is a great value phone (still is) - you get as much bang for the buck and t39 because it's a beatifull phone with bluetooth and everything crammed into such a tiny package.
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 01:05:00
Edit :
Quote
I say the R520 and T68/T68i because they are simply the most feature packed phones and so cheap for what they have. Everything works on them and I have to yet have a Ericsson product that has let me down.
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 01:24:00
Edit :
Quote
GH788
[ This Message was edited by: mariolouis on 2003-03-08 01:22 ]
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 02:21:00
Edit :
Quote
This message was posted from hall of famer, the T39
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 02:37:00
Edit :
Quote
T39 & T68
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 03:07:00
Edit :
Quote
the t68 definitely, but the t39? nah. having virtually the same firmware and features as the r520 (which preceded it, slightly) it was hardly innovative.
my second nomination would definitely be the t28, which was a big innovation in every way at the time, and still has the looks and slimline form factor that the t39 could only hope to imitate badly. i had the t28 for a year before i switched to a t39, and from day one i was looking at the t39 and wondering why they'd taken such a great design and made it so fat and ugly..
--
Posted: 2003-03-08 03:42:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply