>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Product reviews
> P800's Ass Wipped!!!!
Bookmark topic
www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/3238.html
--
Posted: 2003-05-24 02:57:35
Edit :
Quote
The SGH-i500's design is cool but I think if you make a feature by feature comparison the P800 still wins (even if the SGH-i500 sports a 300mhz processor, I still want to dump my files and mp3s to my phone. heeeheehee) Then again the phone isn't released yet so maybe Samsung will add more features (=
--
Posted: 2003-05-24 03:20:16
Edit :
Quote
cool... but i still prefer p800
--
Posted: 2003-05-24 03:41:59
Edit :
Quote
No Bluetooth?
--
Posted: 2003-05-24 13:28:11
Edit :
Quote
It's ok, but the P800 kicks it's ass!
--
Posted: 2003-05-24 13:48:44
Edit :
Quote
I have a feeling we're going to be like the t68i vs. \"the rest\" fight all over again. My guess is that they are going to release a whole bunch of wannabes before maybe managing to beat it before se releases a new phone which will again dominate the rest. And so on and so on.
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2003-05-24 20:09:06
Edit :
Quote
The graffitti area doesn't look very big, I can't imagine it being very easy to enter text that way. Not the nicest looking phone either!
--
Posted: 2003-06-03 00:42:41
Edit :
Quote
it uses palm so it is crap even if it was a a proper smart-phone i wouldn't buy it because it is made by samsung and they make crap phones
--
Posted: 2003-06-05 15:50:52
Edit :
Quote
dude.. that is the ugliest garbage I hv seen
I might as well buy a Clie.. even that has better phone functionnalities than a CDMA
GSM or not.. that thing doesnt hv BT, does it?
what about memory? mp3 playback? video? it doesnt even support XHTML.. it's WAP2.0 compatible!
damn newbies posting crappy phones as "the P800's executionner"
do a lil research before posting jibberish
--
Posted: 2003-06-05 17:11:03
Edit :
Quote
...
--
Posted: 2003-06-12 16:09:27
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
