>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> T65 or R600?
Bookmark topic
Last week I bought a T65 as a second mobile for me is a great phone,great display, incredible battery life, very good and easy sw,in Spain only 150€, just get one you¨ll be happy.
--
Posted: 2002-10-01 00:27:00
Edit :
Quote
Do not buy r600. I am an owner of r600 and now I'm selling it. I found R520m (cheaper than r600 and lots of good features like bluetooth).
GPRS connection with r600 sucks. It stops data transfer after 30 mins.
I hear that r520m is better with connection via GPRS. Also r600 is 3(downlink)+1(uplink) GPRS connection but R520 is 4+1. R600 also has restart problem. But I learned that most ericsson phones has this problem.
--
Posted: 2002-12-11 23:34:00
Edit :
Quote
The t65 supports ericsson accesories like mp3 player & radio, I don't think the r600 does.
--
Posted: 2002-12-12 00:20:00
Edit :
Quote
i bought a t65 for £90 for my sister and my parents got R600's so have played about with both loads. r600 is to be blunt almost a nokia looks nice can change screen colour which looks v nice but it doesnt support any acsessories so can never add ir or bt or have mp3 player or the old origional camera. t65 may not be as flashy but its still very nice and more importantly much more usefull
--
Posted: 2002-12-12 00:37:00
Edit :
Quote
t65...but i would consider a t39
--
Posted: 2002-12-12 16:57:00
Edit :
Quote
I´m a very satisfied owner of a t65 and I strongly recomend it. You can´t change the lights or do stuff like that, but it´s really a great tool. When you try it out, you´ll love it! I promise! Oh, and about the games. Tetris and e-maze are more or less good, but the biorythm is totally useless waste of space. But then again, if you want to play, buy a Gameboy instead!
--
Posted: 2002-12-12 17:09:00
Edit :
Quote
T65,much more powerfull phone than R600.
This post was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2002-12-12 17:13:00
Edit :
Quote
OK here we go which is better T65 or the R600. Well I have been fortunate enough to own a large amount of Ericsson products. I have a 230 house phone in every room 5 in all an R520, T29, T65, T68, T68i, T300, A2628s, A1018s, MCA-10, MCA-20, MCA-25 x2, For some reason two came with my T300, MP3 player, Ericsson walk and talk handsfree, HCA-20 Car kit, chatboard and when I was in Sweden earlier on this year I bought a R600. After 2 days of use I returned the R600 back to the shop Telia in Boras as it was not compatable with any of my accsesories other than my Ericsson handsfree kit. I would go for the T65 far better phone it also has GPRS and POP3 email larger screen T9 which is far better than EZIE text on the R600 yes the R600 is a little smaller and lighter but the T65 has that look of the T68 about it and it has to be a good phone and this is why. I decided to give this phone to my son to use, all was well until one day he left it in his pocket when his trousers were washed. They were on a very hot wash and it was only after the wash we realised they were in his pocket. But after a quick strip down and clean the T65 burst into live and has been fine ever since this is a complement to Ericsson's build quality as nothing in the phone is in any way faulty if anything it runs quicker but I do not recomend you do this to your phone. OH and one last thing even though the R600 is branded ERICSSON it is not built by them and is not in my opinion a proper Ericsson.
--
Posted: 2002-12-26 14:02:00
Edit :
Quote
Hello!
I think Ericsson model T65 is better than R600...
See, in Russia it is not useful to buy R600 because it still haven't supported Russian language. Some month ago we had this problems with T65. But now everythink is OK with it.
Sorry for my poor english...
T65>R600
--
Posted: 2002-12-29 00:02:00
Edit :
Quote
I've got the R600...and believe me your better off with about any other phone!! It has a lotof (software)bugs in it and it's impossible to get a decent ringtone on it. It has many flaws...
I wish I'd bought the T65!!
Greetz
--
Posted: 2002-12-29 13:42:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
