>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Z600 vs E700
Bookmark topic
Hey people,I have my T610 for dating and good function,for make quality foto I have OlympusC150 with 2Mpx CCD,not like fone CMOS.btw E700 have very good designe,better like Z600,but no function.lol
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2003-10-29 23:19:20
Edit :
Quote
@nixin
"look at samsung they have a come a long way remember the A800 did f**k all costed like 300 quid!"
hmmm not entirely sure what youre basin youre statement that the a800 did f**k all on seeing as samsung sold around 1 million a800's and it was one of that years biggest seeling handsets and as a result gave samsung their biggest succes.
samsung is underestimated
me though iz lovin the z600 so iz getting one in place of me p800
--
Posted: 2003-10-29 23:47:39
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-10-29 23:47:39, ShibbyLicious wrote:
@nixin
"look at samsung they have a come a long way remember the A800 did f**k all costed like 300 quid!"
hmmm not entirely sure what youre basin youre statement that the a800 did f**k all on seeing as samsung sold around 1 million a800's and it was one of that years biggest seeling handsets and as a result gave samsung their biggest succes.
samsung is underestimated
me though iz lovin the z600 so iz getting one in place of me p800
isnt samsung #2 (market shares)behind nokia? i dislike clamshells, no matter what the features are, so thats 0.00000001% less off of samsungs market share
--
Posted: 2003-10-29 23:56:17
Edit :
Quote
Just cos it sold does not make it a good phone! the daft people who buy pretty nokia's buy the samsungs!
--
Posted: 2003-10-30 00:08:40
Edit :
Quote
everything have thier pro and con. and every human is uniq in all conditions. ya like might be another ppl dislike.
as for camera.... T610 really poor at night mode.... but from what i tested out.... it's not that bad as shown on ealier. reason.... different of light soruces, position and lots of more things can cause a picture gone.
well.... i don't like shell phone as well... but when i touched the Z600. it's a piece of art(not in size). the true TFT resolution LCD impressed me.... with 3 days battery life.... that's the phone i want. i never had a samsung before, but for my impression thier LCD might be good. but it takes out a lot of battery. for ppl like me... i prefer to owned something last longer in battery. and please remember.... if u really want a nice pciture. get true digital camera.
camera on phone is just a technology to support MMS. to make a closer environment among ppl.
and bluetooth will be the future. just waitting for the FCC standard approval.
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 03:58:00
Edit :
Quote
I thought the Z600 had a TFD screen......
But the E700 has a TFT screen
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 07:33:54
Edit :
Quote
^yeah that's right
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 10:26:51
Edit :
Quote
Well i must admit. The E700 looks superb!! Too bad it's not a
...
[ This Message was edited by: McKajVah on 2003-11-01 10:13 ]
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 11:12:58
Edit :
Quote
I've used both phones and the Samsung photos are REAL!!! The camera is fantastic, better than that of the Z600, the memory is also 9mb while the
only has 2mb.... The
is nicer to use when it's open and it is very much like the T610! The E700 has BEAUTIFUL ringtones compared to the Z600, but then the Z600 has the advantage of
, better battery, TRIband!!!!! And it's a pity that you can't asign a picture of a person to the E700, having a double colourscreen that it is a big fault!
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 11:16:06
Edit :
Quote
To Vlammetje
Mijn nachtcamera van de P800 is veel beter dan de cam van de E700
:D
PS mijn engels is klote,maar ik probeer het
:D
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 11:35:45
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
