>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Nokia 7610 vs SE K700
Bookmark topic
bravo mckinley i agree ! pic taken with samsung is much better ! and btw you nokia lovers what you do it here anyway?????? go in finland with first nokia buts what you can find in your town hahahaha
--
Posted: 2004-03-22 16:15:18
Edit :
Quote
i see where this thread is going.... again
--
Posted: 2004-03-22 16:40:41
Edit :
Quote
I have nt been on esato much recently and nothing has changed people slagging of nokia for the sake it . Some questions how do we know the pic wap taken with that nokia or that someone has nt messed with it to prove a point and since its there first 1mp do you think they will release it if the quality wap that poor i dont think so
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2004-03-22 16:47:18
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-03-22 16:40:41, mmsman wrote:
i see where this thread is going.... again
I guess it is my fault
I just can't help it but I hate mobiles designed by Nokia.
They are almost all ugly.
But soon they will release 8800 and 8100 with metal finish so I guess many will want to buy one of them if the specification and price is good.
--
Posted: 2004-03-22 17:18:40
Edit :
Quote
these are pictures of the final productions of the 7610.. not from PROTOTYPE 7610's fotos people here posted
c'mon people we've got to admit these ones are good.. I hate close minded ppl.. fu-ck em. I LOVE SE but if theres a better phone, i see my possibilities...
you've got to remember the picture depends on many elements like sun light and other stuff...
this one next its a pic of the comparison between the t610's camera and the 7610's... the one on the upper left corner its from the t610.
of course its not fair to compare a CIF camera and a 1megapix.. but between these two phone which one do the SE DIE HARDS preffer?
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 02:50:33
Edit :
Quote
Wow that Samsung image
Then the cam in P730 must be the same
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 11:13:32
Edit :
Quote
That is great quality picz
Shame the K700i extended pictures are not of such quality
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 21:21:16
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Am i wrong in saying i thought the k700 had a 1.3 megapixel camera?
This message was posted from a Z600
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 22:29:54
Edit :
Quote
No, the K700i camera is VGA (640 x 480)
Only through intoleration can the picture become bigger
This was used on the T630
The way its works is that each pixel is kinda multiplied by 4 (from the surrounding pixels - colour etc)
It makes the picture bigger
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 22:44:18
Edit :
Quote
Yep,..you're thinking of the S-700,..that has a 1.3 MP
K700 cam is quite good, better than most VGA's.
I was actually standing with the 7610 some days ago,..really like it, but when I saw the K700i, I knew right away which one I would buy.
It doesnt all depend on the camera,..also built quality, connectivity etc are important/more important to me,...and the K700 is ahead on these things.
Not that the 7610 is poor quality, but the K700 is just so well built !
And having just had a 6600, I didnt really want to play around with more "pc-connectivity-issues",...SE is clearly better at this !
Remember NOT TO slaughter me, I actually like the 7610,..its a great phone, it was just beaten,..in MY opinion.
BR
Jan
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 22:44:31
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
