General discussions : Non mobile discussion : Michael Jackson does'nt have a mobilephone
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> Michael Jackson does'nt have a mobilephone
Bookmark topic
For all the
detals?
--
Posted: 2005-05-05 22:34:21
Edit :
Quote
what are detals. i know what details are but not detals.
--
Posted: 2005-05-05 22:37:42
Edit :
Quote
The fact he does not have a mobile is not really suprising he couldnt really give his number out any way could he! The fact he calls money French Fries is not really that much of a supprise either, he is convinced a Black man can become a White man and no one will notice! the bloke is clearly barking mad!!!
I used to like Michael's stuff but sorry I simply cannot have the mans image or music around me any longer. Thanks to the way American "Justice" works! (you got the Dollars you go free no question) we shall never know the truth, and for me there are just too many coincidences.
_________________
A happy P900 owner again
[ This Message was edited by: Nitro Fan on 2005-05-08 16:05 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Nitro Fan on 2005-05-08 16:10 ]
--
Posted: 2005-05-08 17:01:28
Edit :
Quote
How is he going to pay the lawyers by the way? :-):-):-):-):-)
This message was posted from a Z1010
--
Posted: 2005-05-08 17:09:59
Edit :
Quote
With Fench fries i presume!
--
Posted: 2005-05-08 17:10:41
Edit :
Quote
the bloke is barkers, and even if he did have a mobile, i wonder what you would find on it eh
--
Posted: 2005-05-08 17:19:01
Edit :
Quote
I think the SAR level mite damage the surgery he had on hìs face.
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2005-05-08 17:55:45
Edit :
Quote
Hes a great artist, and hes innocent until proven guilty, hes never been convicted of serious charges and if you read up to date news on the trial, people have testified his innocence in the past.
When you can dance like that, when your the king of pop, then take a knock at him.
--
Posted: 2005-05-08 18:16:38
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-05-08 18:16:38, Yazan24 wrote:
Hes a great artist, and hes innocent until proven guilty, hes never been convicted of serious charges and if you read up to date news on the trial, people have testified his innocence in the past.
When you can dance like that, when your the king of pop, then take a knock at him.
Errrr I think you will find an equal number of people who have testified in this trial that say the exact opposite!! so that argument is kind of weak, being a good dancer is not really that important in life and generaly only of any kind of importance to young kids keen to impress girlies and their mates!! being a good dancer is NO kind of defence in court! the "king" of pop? The one and only king of pop died years ago he was called Elvis!!! are you 12 years old!?
_________________
A happy P900 owner again
[ This Message was edited by: Nitro Fan on 2005-05-08 17:33 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Nitro Fan on 2005-05-08 17:48 ]
--
Posted: 2005-05-08 18:32:34
Edit :
Quote
Elvis was the king of rock dumbass.
No but I mean he was a great artist, and deserves to be recognized for his achievements in the field of music. He redefined pop, Im just making it clear you should seperate his personal life from his musical achievements and recognize them all the same.
--
Posted: 2005-05-08 18:58:06
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
