Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Nokia 7650 versus MCA-20
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Nokia 7650 versus MCA-20 Bookmark topic
Page <  1234>

adamrj Posts: 155

>>I just hope they start hiring better desginers...

Perhaps Jan (JH67) could knock up a few designs for them!

Adam
--
Posted: 2002-08-08 16:04:00
Edit : Quote

Super G Posts: > 500

The P800's camera looks strangely similar to that of 7650. At least the lens part looks the same...

But again, these are not replacing good old digital cameras.
And their pictures are targetted on going from mobile to mobile via MMS. So if you consider looking at them only on a mobile phone (small screen), their imperfections would not show that much. Bearing this in mind, the blue-ish color of the 7650's pictures is probably well adapted to the 7650 screen, or in general to a mobile phone color screen??

--
Posted: 2002-08-09 10:04:00
Edit : Quote

Cophia Posts: > 500


Again, please note the lack of focus control on all these devices.

The colour may be good at 90k colours on average per outdoor shot (depending on subject) but there is no focus!! It will never be as sharp as a good digital camera, it was never designed to be. And in bad lighting without a flash facility, it is pretty bad.

For MMS, the lack of focus-control is not that important when using 80x60 (etc.) sized pictures. You may get some shots at 640x480 or better still, 320x240 that are okay for websites.

The digital zoom or tele-foto facility also degrades the real picture, but for smaller sizes on an MMS it's an okay facility (although I wouldn't use it on a daily basis).

Those pictures that were posted on:

http://mobile.burn.com/review.jsp?Id=82

really are about as good (focus-wise) as you will get!!



--
Posted: 2002-08-09 13:04:00
Edit : Quote

dal_l Posts: 97

Interesting ... I came across another review and the 7650 is closer to a digi-cam than the MCA-20 .... IMO, the 7650 is slightly blurry, has richer tones and blue cast while the MCA-20 is slightly sharper, washed out colors and a reddish cast.

http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/nokia/7650review/p3.htm
--
Posted: 2002-08-09 18:25:00
Edit : Quote

azzuri Posts: 3

Which of the 2 cameras is better?
MCA 20 or MCA 10 ???
--
Posted: 2002-08-09 22:27:00
Edit : Quote

Hellmanen Posts: 21

Id say mca-20 coz I think it takes bigger images....


[ This Message was edited by: Hellmanen on 2002-08-09 23:18 ]
--
Posted: 2002-08-09 23:42:00
Edit : Quote

ppcrockar Posts: > 500

@ jplacson

The Ericsson Cameras was (AFAIK) developed by Anoto Group (Former C-Techonlogies, the makers of the C-Pen, and the Ericsson Chatpen). The cameras uses Anoto's ASIC.
--
Posted: 2002-08-10 23:02:00
Edit : Quote

decoy7 Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2002-08-09 22:27, azzuri wrote:
Which of the 2 cameras is better?
MCA 20 or MCA 10 ???


MCA-20 is easily better, no contest.

MCA-10 picture size is same as the display screen of your phone so its only purpose would be to take pictures of people you want in your address book.
--
Posted: 2002-08-11 01:11:00
Edit : Quote

john74 Posts: > 500

http://www.pbase.com/image/3755552 HERES A 7650 photo taken in Normal mode

_________________
I NOW OWN A NOKIA 7650... Moderator of... http://my.wapjag.com/ericssont68

[ This Message was edited by: john74 on 2002-08-11 12:58 ]
--
Posted: 2002-08-11 13:56:00
Edit : Quote

john74 Posts: > 500

Heres one taken with my old MCA-10 http://www.pbase.com/image/3755738
--
Posted: 2002-08-11 14:05:00
Edit : Quote
Page <  1234>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home