>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post your Pictures/Videos taken by C905
Bookmark topic
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
thtz ur opinion plank and its ok to have one ... but please do not b negative about some else pics ... just as u like ur pics reduced they like their pics in full size ... we need to respect each other opinions , not criticize thm
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 21:22:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-10-27 21:17:44, plankgatan wrote:
i want c905 start produce this thick, sharp quality as c902.......
zzzzzzzzzzzz....huh? Did I miss something? Oh no. It's just the same old thing over, and over, and over, and over, and zzzzzzzz......
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 21:33:20
Edit :
Quote
come one here...is it forbidden to critize c905 here ??????
should we just sit here and say...oohhh every c905 pics here is just stunning ??? (its something whos not right here..sonyericsson should take this firmware and put it up somewhere ...yes they should.
give us good firmware/cam driver who can produce sharp, great pictures for god sake....(just like this older R1AA...)
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-10-27 20:52 ]
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 21:42:12
Edit :
Quote
Not at all. But I wondering if you could ever post on a thread and not mention the most amazing camera in the world, the C902. Again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again...
These C905 pictures are not crap. All my first pics were taken on a cloudy day. I said that clearly, but you still said they were poor.
Then when they were taken on a sunny day, you said they were good.
But now you've changed your mind again, and all other pictures before the ones above were poor. WTF?
The C902 is still the best in the world though. Of course.
I want to enjoy my C905, but I just don't want to post the pictures in here cause you hang around ready to tell everyone why they are bad, how they would be better if this that and the other were done different, and how the C902 is so far and away better.
You just suck the fun out of photos!
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 21:51:36
Edit :
Quote
Normal quality setting macro(not the high option , i forgot to adjust to that setting in the beginning after i did a master reset) smart contrast
Same av above but without smart contrast (what good is smart contrast? It only seem to bleach the shots)
Same as above but no smart contrast and "normal" quality in the settings. Daylaight setting..i think
Not my house
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 22:14:01
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
yes u r rite fullforce ... smart contrast does bleach thm out ...
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 22:20:33
Edit :
Quote
Yup! I think smart contrast might (with the current fimware at least) be good for shooting outdoors in cloudy dusky wheather. But indoors and closeups get bad.
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 22:25:46
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
mayb smart contrast is for outdoor pics ... also y do u have normal settings rather than "fine"? just wondering
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 22:28:23
Edit :
Quote
I never had any real success with Smart Contrast either. I look at it as more of a gimmick than anything, a bit like Photo Fix. It doesn't really help all that much.
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 22:45:37
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
guess we can discard using smart contrast for now thn .... good good ... now we need to know how pics and videos look when viewed via the tv out cable ... only pop lover has tht cable for now ... hmmmmm
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 22:47:36
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
