Sony Ericsson / Sony : Symbian phones : Post your pictures (and videos) taken with your G900/G700
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> Post your pictures (and videos) taken with your G900/G700
Bookmark topic
G900
close-up ,no flash LED ,low light
almost macro
(no Flash LED)
cloudy+low light
close-up with flash LED
dusk
sunny, auto mode
dusk 2 low light
close-up ,completly dark ,flash LED on
sunny
sunny close-up
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 18:39:42
Edit :
Quote
These G900 pics look great. I mean some are blurry, but the most are great. As i see, it would need a little more contrast, a little extra sharpness, and some color saturation. Any way to enhance the pictures (without editing them with photoshop..) ?
--
Posted: 2008-08-14 16:29:36
Edit :
Quote
First pic with G900
My backyard
--
Posted: 2008-09-02 14:29:37
Edit :
Quote
More pics! G900's pic quality is great stuff
backyard again lol
this valey is called 'vale do mondego'
random desk
--
Posted: 2008-09-03 20:10:45
Edit :
Quote
been on a photo shootout today. came out with these:
(C902 quality
)
______________
curently owning: J220 ,W810 ,K550 ,G900;
Nokia: N90 ,2610
lost: S700 ,T630
R.I.P.: SE T105, T230, Z200; sold: K800i
[ This Message was edited by: Alex_230 on 2008-09-04 17:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-04 18:36:29
Edit :
Quote
nice pics! great quality indeed
do you usually modify brightness or just use the default?
--
Posted: 2008-09-05 01:53:13
Edit :
Quote
lol if i don't modify EV, it will give very bright and glowing pictures. I always use -0.7 or even -1.0 EV. This is a problem. SE should have put -0.7 EV as 0.0
EDIT: can you post full sized pictures? i want to look at them with EXIF..
EV 0.0
EV -1.0
[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2008-09-05 14:38 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-05 15:10:50
Edit :
Quote
what you people don't understand is that this is a mobile phone camera not a camera with a mobile phone as a bonus. thus beeing a mobile phone camera ,it has a realy small sensor ,so the white ballance isn't always correct and that's why EV is there for.
of course i use EV balancing ,some of the pics are shot even with -2.0.
the white balance option is there to USE it ,not to let it at +/- 0.0.
yes ,i miss the spot photometry that i had in K800 and S700 ,but now it compensates with a lower EV value.
_________________
curently owning: J220 ,W810 ,K550 ,G900;
Nokia: N90 ,2610
lost: S700 ,T630
R.I.P.: SE T105, T230, Z200; sold: K800i
[ This Message was edited by: Alex_230 on 2008-09-05 15:21 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-05 16:19:47
Edit :
Quote
and besides that.. if a picture is too bright, it's not that hard to correct it with whatever software you prefer.
--
Posted: 2008-09-05 17:59:01
Edit :
Quote
Well you guys are optimistic! then buy a phone with no camera. we live in the 21st century!!!! I hate those people who say "it's a mobile phone not a digicam". So what? Sensor size is same as any other phone camera sensor, IT'S THE DRIVER THATS NEED FIXIN'! You guys don't know because you didn't have a K810. Let me explain. When K800 came out, pictures looked good, good WB, etc. Then came the K810, and it had a major problem. Pictures where too washed out (look at mobile review and you will find the comparison between K800 and K810), and then came the driver (custom made) that fixed it all, and K810 was as good as K800. So don't give me this BS about sensor and size. If you have a good software, made by good people (like number1, Raider, etc not idiot SE developers) you can have decent pictures. Even in low light the 0.0 EV is too much. So you guys eighter read or shut up.
EDIT: besides, on of the modders said that its camera is as good as the K850s camera. (if not K850, then K800 for sure)
and LOL alex.. you need to read more. "UIQ 3 -> UIQ 3.3 in next firmware?"
Np man, i like you all. i'm angry because i found tons of bugs in phone, and i can only share it with you guys.
[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2008-09-05 18:04 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-05 18:27:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
