>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia Lumia 920 PureView Thread
Bookmark topic
http://us.digitalversus.com/d[....]567c2cf71382600ffddf447c48b579
I'm more surprised by HTC 8x superb quality rather than yet again very average performance of 920.
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2012-11-02 16:51 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-02 17:51:14
Edit :
Quote
Hmmm,being of mixed reviews some saying great camera others not. I imagine it's down to useless reviewers who cannot or do not know how to take good images. The HTC I have seen elsewhere and again they had poor details
_________________
Material things don't matter,but Rock n Roll does!!!!
Nokia Lumia 800 White
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-11-02 17:49 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-02 18:47:00
Edit :
Quote
I think the verge got a point in that the 920 has a better camera if you know how to use it, harder to point and shoot...
--
Posted: 2012-11-02 19:36:04
Edit :
Quote
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-11-10 18:19 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-02 20:09:49
Edit :
Quote
HTC 8X camera samples
http://www.phonearena.com/rev[....]one-8X-Review_id3168/page/3#1-
--
Posted: 2012-11-02 20:57:11
Edit :
Quote
It should be fine for 99% of the user base.. but its nothing special. The real benefit from the OIS system is in video recording, not stills. It has some benefit in stills, but its limited by the small sensor/pixels .. If they combine the system from the 808 with OIS we might have something more concrete. In fact, the PV pro system really needs good video stabilization...
BTW the 808 is the same.. to get the maximum out of it, you need to kind of know what you are doing, which for me personally is the attractive part.. so I wouldn't mind that to be the case with the 920, the only problem is that you really have no settings on the 920, far from what you get on the symbian based device.. so I guess it will more about positioning, lighting, etc.
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2012-11-02 21:31 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-02 22:29:10
Edit :
Quote
Engadget review
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KWhRxgL9HE8
Also written review they said it's a brillaint device all round
http://m.engadget.com/2012/11/02/nokia-lumia-920-review/?icid=eng_latest_art
_________________
Material things don't matter,but Rock n Roll does!!!!
Nokia Lumia 800 White
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-11-03 00:04 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-03 00:47:00
Edit :
Quote
It was good to hear that they contacted Nokia about the camera blur, that kind of problems is all about software so they should be able to fix it
They got the hardware now they need to optimize it too ...
[ This Message was edited by: Ravager on 2012-11-03 11:31 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-03 12:30:06
Edit :
Quote
Interesting Comparison Photo Between
Nokia Lumia 920 PureView LITE Vs
Samsung Galaxy S III !!!
http://www.slashgear.com/noki[....]samsung-galaxy-s-iii-01255193/
P.S: In My Opinion, Unable To Determine Winner... Both Devices Exhibit "
Similar Results", What attests What's the Times Affirming Here I Come, In Other Words, 920 PureView Lite Has Identical Performance The Apparatus
Xperia T,
Optimus G,
Galaxy S III,
Galaxy Note II,
Xperia P And
IPhone 5 !!!
--
Posted: 2012-11-03 18:18:56
Edit :
Quote
^up, nice find. Quality on 920 is worse than SGS III, but it's most likely easy to fix with software upgrade. This photo
http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-c[....]ds/2012/11/WP_20121101_011.jpg has very good lighting, exposure time is 1/2331, but still the blur is very noticeable. On the other hand SGS III is very sharp. Right now Lumia 920 can match Xperia T in daylight photos, and T is very average
And what's the deal with all Lumia 920 posted photos being 16:9?
--
Posted: 2012-11-03 21:01:12
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
