Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 212213214 ... 493494495>

plankgatan Posts: > 500

it dosent mater that much, think the quality is ok for a cell phone, i just showed them because i thought they was ok... more important is that this camera with a better driver, can produce high quality pics...thats whats depends for me.

its hard to produce 100% quality-pics all time..its just a cell phone.
(if every pics became like this, you didnt need a real camera..he he)

http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/8600/dsc00394hk7.jpg


http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8671/dsc00391kq9.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-30 21:18 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 22:11:29
Edit : Quote

larry 68 Posts: > 500

DonJuan

You post some really nice pics, I enjoy seeing something a bit different and what a place to do it in, if you dont like the quality of your K850i you could always swop for mine, I can only get about 5% decent shots.
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 22:14:37
Edit : Quote

bavlondon2 Posts: > 500


On 2008-01-30 22:11:29, plankgatan wrote:
it dosent mater that much, think the quality is ok for a cell phone, i just showed them because i thought they was ok... more important is that this camera with a better driver, can produce high quality pics...thats whats depends for me.

its hard to produce 100% quality-pics all time..its just a cell phone.
(if every pics became like this, you didnt need a real camera..he he)

http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/8600/dsc00394hk7.jpg


http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8671/dsc00391kq9.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-30 21:18 ]


No its not. N95/N95 8gb/N82/Viewty and even G600 produce better pics in those conditions. Overall quite dissapointing from SE.
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 22:21:19
Edit : Quote

franique Posts: 24


+taken in Cordova, Spain+ [br]

+Alhambra and Generalife, Spain+[br]

+Gaudi, Spain+

[ This Message was edited by: franique on 2008-01-30 21:37 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 22:27:17
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

@bavlondon... whatever....you dont know what you talking about..do you realy think a cell phone can produce much better quality then this...im not some rookie who sit here and praise some k850 pics becuase i like ..i praised this pics because i know there is no cell phone who manage it much better...(i had N82 for some days, so yes i know it have a good camera with a little stronger flash then k850...but overall, its not better then k850 right now)

G800...you must be kidding me...G800 is the worse 5 M.P phone i ever seen.
take a look at Flickr.com at some G800 pics, then you tell me:

ps.... here you have G800...its realy bad


_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-30 21:36 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 22:30:47
Edit : Quote

bavlondon2 Posts: > 500

Actually I said G600.
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 22:35:39
Edit : Quote

Vipera ammodytes Posts: > 500

Plank what is your firmware dude. I had 37 and the pic's were awful. I took a pic of me and my wife. With the flash and the results were really bad. I'll post it when i get home. Last night i changed my firmware to t mobile international's 38 on davinci's website. I'm hoping i'll get better results now.



every k850 sucks mate, just some people edit pictures and then they looks better

its easy to edit photo on pc and then transfer them to phone and open it in photodj and save it, result will be normal exif, without data from PC program
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 22:45:38
Edit : Quote

brewcaster Posts: 77

ughhhh, no more no more no more. If you are here to look at photos from a k850, great. If you are here to post pictures of k850, great. If you are here to just criticize, than please leave. Plank, I really want to encourage you to stop responding to the internet ass-clowns. I am getting realllly tired of re-reading this tired argument over the quality of the camera. Plank, if you are confident, then don't respond to them. Let's just get back to looking at awesome photos taken with this (IN MY OPINION) awesome phone.
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 23:09:24
Edit : Quote

sadeghi85 Posts: 341


On 2008-01-30 22:45:38, Vipera ammodytes wrote:


its easy to edit photo on pc and then transfer them to phone and open it in photodj and save it, result will be normal exif, without data from PC program



You're wrong, PhotoDJ will remove EXIF completely. those pics look good cos they are ~12 times smaller than original!


Why all 5mp CMOS based camphones are inferior to K800/K810 quality-wise

--
Posted: 2008-01-30 23:14:12
Edit : Quote

*Jojo* Posts: > 500


On 2008-01-30 22:27:17, franique wrote:

+taken in Cordova, Spain+ [br]






@fran - I really LIKE this shot ! Looks like a mini-coliseum that can be found in - Rome
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 23:20:56
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 212213214 ... 493494495>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home