>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> C905 CamDriver Modded
Bookmark topic
@jake20
nice comparison. both shot are great. EMS one a bit over saturated. I guess you can play with manual adjustment.
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 00:22:38
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-24 23:52:35, fe1ixs wrote:
@edwardob
nice pics. sharp & contrast. which driver did you use for the shot?
[ This Message was edited by: fe1ixs on 2009-11-24 22:58 ]
full auto vit ems 1.1 driver...
[ This Message was edited by: edwardob on 2009-11-24 23:44 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 00:44:00
Edit :
Quote
i find it almost impossible to replicate the above EMS 1.1 picture I took.. maybe its just the sensitivity of this camera, but it seems like every picture comes out different no matter what settings you have on.
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 01:00:56
Edit :
Quote
"shootout DM 3.8 vs VIT EMS 1.1
I believe the winner here is EMS 1.1, as its more accurate color and lighting. "
but still 3.8 is beta....overall EMS 1.1 seems to have great capabilities...now l am currently testing 3.8 DM,but in fiew days EMS is next
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 01:22:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-25 01:22:16, kronos12 wrote:
"shootout DM 3.8 vs VIT EMS 1.1
I believe the winner here is EMS 1.1, as its more accurate color and lighting. "
but still 3.8 is beta....overall EMS 1.1 seems to have great capabilities...now l am currently testing 3.8 DM,but in fiew days EMS is next
i honestly do not know which driver is really better.. both produce great images
I think VIT's driver does need MANUAL ISO control though.. then I think I would switch over to it definitely!
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2009-11-25 00:58 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 01:51:07
Edit :
Quote
another shootout .. DM3.8 vs VIT EMS 1.1
auto with flash
EMS 1.1
DM 3.8 w/color correction
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 02:45:22
Edit :
Quote
I prefer the second bec. the color is not that dark.
@Vit
I don't mean anything i'm just saying that I like DM's color more.
Be angry if you want, but I'm not here to argue.
[ This Message was edited by: wahehe15 on 2009-11-25 06:56 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 07:48:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-25 02:45:22, jake20 wrote:
another shootout .. DM3.8 vs VIT EMS
if comparison is to be accurate...well then everything would have to be on auto!
you have dm3.8 with colour correction..[that's not auto]
if you had used saturation control on ems1.1 you would have got better colour
auto must be auto full on both
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 11:55:39
Edit :
Quote
examples..no saturation adjustment
slight saturation adjust...-03
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 14:34:27
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-25 11:55:39, edwardob wrote:
On 2009-11-25 02:45:22, jake20 wrote:
another shootout .. DM3.8 vs VIT EMS
if comparison is to be accurate...well then everything would have to be on auto!
you have dm3.8 with colour correction..[that's not auto]
if you had used saturation control on ems1.1 you would have got better colour
auto must be auto full on both
I disagree with you here.
The DM Color correction is an AUTO setting in my eyes. You set color correction On or Off, and it stays that way even when you close the camera and come back in.
Yes, Vit's driver has the ability to tune the saturation, which is great, but then you have to manually adjust the levels.
That is not an ON or OFF option, like DM's color correction.
I am not saying DM's color correction is better, only that it is an AUTO feature in my eyes.
Why don't you take some comparison shots yourself then, since I seem to be the only one willing to make the effort to do this, and my only goal is to help the community produce the best driver possible, whether its Vit's EMS or DM's.
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2009-11-25 14:59 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-25 15:55:24
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
