Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho)
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho) Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 224225226 ... 618619620>

PeterKay Posts: > 500




--
Posted: 2008-09-22 12:21:28
Edit : Quote

masada1971 Posts: > 500

so,is it available yet,on the stores??where did you get it from??
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 12:44:45
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500

Me wants!

so,is it available yet,on the stores??where did you get it from??

He's a proto tester.
_________________
Make sure you visit the "Post your photoshopped wallpapers here!" thread every week or so for graphically-rich goodies!:D

[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-09-22 11:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 12:45:15
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500


On 2008-09-22 08:30:21, Janbobejan wrote:

You are saying, - phone cam sensors are simply too small for high iso's to be effective. Hmmm . . . have a look at the INNOV8 bud Is fine with me if you are confussed, but please, don't confuse others !


Grow a bit of maturity mate. I don't care how much you love your innov8 BUD, the fact remains phone cam sensors are very small and noise is a bad enough issue as it is without introducing high iso ratings. To compensate for high iso, the image has to be compressed which results in less detail. If your innov8 high iso pics look fine on the handset itself, have a look on a computer monitor and you will see they are either full of noise or have severe compression (results in the water colour affect and loss of detail)

btw, I am basing my comments on a broad range of experience with digital cameras, including DSLR's, and I AM NOT talking about only SE cameras so take your innov8 fanboy hysteria elsewhere.

tbh I think it's quite naive to believe that a camera phone is immune to noise at high iso values. If you don't understand photographic technology don't accuse others of the same.

--
Posted: 2008-09-22 12:52:41
Edit : Quote

PeterKay Posts: > 500


On 2008-09-22 12:00:22, gola wrote:
Is that the w595 on the far left?



it is indeed
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 13:16:20
Edit : Quote

SilveR. Posts: > 500

nice.. protos..

Retail version will be out soon I hope..

@PK
There is a Video Call cam at front right. now you have the prototypes, then u can confirm it..
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 13:27:23
Edit : Quote

naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500

MashAllah ... PK .. congrats on the new phone .. show us some pics and some videos taken with this phone as well
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 13:29:26
Edit : Quote

Radu_91 Posts: 201

that is an old C905 prototype without video call camera and on the side is written 8 megapixel instead of 8.1
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 13:45:06
Edit : Quote

EddieAdams Posts: 251


On 2008-09-22 08:30:21, Janbobejan wrote:


You are saying, - phone cam sensors are simply too small for high iso's to be effective. Hmmm . . . have a look at the INNOV8 bud Is fine with me if you are confussed, but please, don't confuse others !


Curious how well it does WITHOUT A XENON FLASH. You do realize the initial price of the innov8 is nearly double that of the c905's initial price. $1170 vs. $650(so you're "the guy" willing to fork over $1200 for a cell phone) IMO the innov8 is not nearly as good looking as the c905. Also 8 seconds between photos is a little impratical.(think i read that somewhere) While I think the video capture of the c905 is a short-coming, for me it is not a deal breaker by any means. The combination of Xenon and video-light/torch the c905 posesses IS a big deal for me. For $1200 you should atleast get something that can snap a decent pic in low-light situations.
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 15:38:01
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500

^^Ditto.
--
Posted: 2008-09-22 16:06:26
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 224225226 ... 618619620>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home