>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Nokia N73 vs SE K800i which is better?
Bookmark topic
Some people are saying k800 is good because it sells very well. Thats not a necessary conclusion. Usually phones with bigger sales are cheaper phones with strong marketing and design (k800), not necessarily ībetterī phones. Certainly n95 wont sell as much as k800 but im sure it will totally crush k800.
Someone also said that k800īs less advanced functions when compared to n73 or N series is a strategy, they r using worst tech than they could in order to sell more. Cīmon, does that make any sense?
doesnt make so many high end phones as nokia simply because it cannot afford it, thats not an advantage, its a drawback. Many
users are disappointed with the way
has changed, this new line of īspecializedī phones with downgraded functions may sell more phones because of its marketing (walkman, cybershot) but its the pretty much the same platform with a few upgrades and DOWNGRADES that
is selling again and according to predictions
will sell it again next year in īthinnerī versions. ahahahah Im sure if
had more money it would be able to produce phones with better techs in every segment because it would invest more in R&D, like nokia. Iīm saying this because some people were trying to upgrade k800 by saying how successful and strong
is right now. Cīmon, lets not start comparing nokia to
in terms of success and sales... it would be like comparing sun to microsoft.
Now, back to the topic.
I didnt reject any personal argument of anyone i just said that it would fit better in a different thread because otherwise the discussion would go forever.
--
Posted: 2006-11-06 19:44:37
Edit :
Quote
I think this discussion is going no where...I think that if you like symbian and use its features go for n73 if yo dont ...go for k800
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 00:42:16
Edit :
Quote
one advice peoples...
i dont want to tell you that K800 is not worth its money, its worth if u want to go on SE, if u want to go on better phone by build quality - go on N73, i had K800i for 8 days, i would stay on my K750i, but the main thing, as far we had experienced things with nokia camera's had anyone compared N'Series 2 MBpix cam pics with K750 or any of SE with 2MBpix cam, by my self i would say in some options(probably more then half) Nokia cam pixel is beter quality then SE, but sometimes is not. its realy depends how clear u gonna take a shot
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 00:49:26
Edit :
Quote
sloopjohnB.. well.. you say.. SE cannot support to make highend phone. I think that is very reasonable. How old is SE? bloody 5 years old!! and as far as i know, back then in 2002, they are not even popular. No one knows SE.. i mean, they do not go for SE. Now, SE already has a brand recognition. Look at what we are doing now.. we are comparing the bloody 5 years old kid with his bloody 100+++ years old the great grandfather nokia. Of course.. Nokia will have more experience and money and so on. But, considering nokia in its first 5 years back then 100 years ago, SE is definitely better (i know it doesnt make any sense to compare it that way, neither the way you compare it now). Btw, even now we already forgot about the 40 years old father samsung and the grandfather motorola. SE is indeed has done a good job.
Well, phones that makes better sales that you are talking about is probably only around 100 dolars cheaper. It is not that significant, yet the difference in sales that they perform is quite significant. Nobody here say that it is a conclusion that K800 is better due to higher sales. Look, if you go to a restaurant, then you see nobody's there on the peak hour, will you go there? only few possibilities: the food is bad, the food is expensive or both. The same thing here as well, if K800 has a good sales, then that its like a popular restaurant that you will even talk about it to your friend and you recommend the restaurant so that your friend will go there--regardless what you say about K800, it definitely appealing to alot of ppl, thus it is highly popular.
Anyway, i want to go back to topic as well.. look, the thread says "which is better, K800 or N73?". So, there is no specifically being mentioned "which is better in terms of specs, K800 or N73 or so". So whats wrong with putting ppl preferences, circumstances and everything else? Isn't it part of the process when they make the phone as well (I mean, i am sure up to some degree the company must think about these aspects when they want to make and sell phones.. Customer is in the end product that they are aiming for, they must know their customer, so all of the little things aspects that i mention to you is indeed very important and that also takes part in making decision which one is better). If you really want to stick to the specs, make a different thread and say this "K800 and N73, which one has a better specs and techs?". Then, everything else must be cut down. If you make such a thread, i will say nothing, coz i that N73 is indeed has a better specs.
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 01:36:19
Edit :
Quote
If everyone agrees to make this thread from now on a thread about - hands on experiences, who am i to stand against everybody? I just want to advice whoever created the thread or whoever read it to remember that this is a
forum, therefore the outcome of this approch is pretty predictable.
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 03:28:00
Edit :
Quote
ares
Quote:funny how the fanboy mib1800 only answered to part of your great and incisive post for instance, not a single world about how the "powerfull" n73 doesnīt have stereo bluetooth lol
Darn, do expect me to do your job (i.e. blowing the trumpet for K800) for you?
Well, in that case, do you mind if I borrow the typical response that loyal SE fanboy like you love to use i.e. "...not many people know or use stereo bluetooth so this feature is not an advantage..." ?
Then again I wont.
a2dp support and xenon flash are advantages that K800 have over N73
nalbagli
Quote:I think he wants to know what WE think of the phone..
I think he just want to know which phone is better.
Quote:I think that if you like symbian and use its features go for n73 if yo dont ...go for k800
Even if you dont use symbian, the out-of-box functionalities of N73 are way ahead of K800. The main reason I can see that you dont want to buy the N73 is that you cannot afford the extra 70euros. Unless of course you are an extremely loyal SE fan (like ares
) who think that sticking the "cybershot" logo on the K800 is the best thing that ever happen to mobile phone.
sesukaku
Quote:The same thing here as well, if K800 has a good sales, then that its like a popular restaurant that you will even talk about it to your friend and you recommend the restaurant so that your friend will go there--regardless what you say about K800, it definitely appealing to alot of ppl, thus it is highly popular.
Well, nothing wrong with it. But on the other hand, we want to go above this herd instinct and make a better informed choice. hmmm....i remember many SE fans in this forum like to say "...nokia makes crap phone. people buy them because they are mindlessly following everyone else". Such an irony isnt it?
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2006-11-07 02:42 ]
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 03:38:51
Edit :
Quote
@Mib1800
If the author of the thread does not want to know our opinions of the phones why would he post this thread in a USERS FORUM?....for knowing the specs of a phone just go to sony ericsson and nokia webpage.
Could you please tell me the "real benefits" of n73 over k800 if you dont use symbian?
[ This Message was edited by: nalbagli on 2006-11-07 02:54 ]
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 03:53:02
Edit :
Quote
nalbagli
Quote:If the author of the thread does not want to know our opinions of the phones why would he post this thread in a USERS FORUM?....for knowing the specs of a phone just go to sony ericsson and nokia webpage.
Could you please tell me the "real benefits" of n73 over k800 if you dont use symbian?
I think he would be more interested to know which phone is better based on factual feedback (and not personal preferences) from users here. For example, it is more useful to him if someone feedback that "N73 allows you to view office doc on the phone" instead of one that says "N73 office doc capability is not an advantage because I dont use as I always carry my notebook everywhere I go"
I thought I have given you the "real benefits" without using the symbian capability. Just see the 20 or so points in my post on page 14. I have not even start to mention the many userful Symbian add-on which can make your N73 much more useful and versatile. For those of us who are really "using symbian", the capability of K800 is so inadequate.
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 04:56:57
Edit :
Quote
well put again mate
[ This Message was edited by: SloopJohnB on 2006-11-07 04:22 ]
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 05:21:40
Edit :
Quote
ah.. everyone is calming down.. i think we started to see a light here.
--
Posted: 2006-11-07 09:46:55
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
