>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> The first man on earth?
Bookmark topic
[quote]
On 2007-09-08 07:59:40, Twometre wrote:
On 2007-09-05 11:13:22, batesie wrote:
the bible is fictional
they should only be listened to as a loose guide to how modern morals should be based on. ie the 10 commandments....
the rest is a load of cobbles
The bible is a miraculous and one true famous book. Everything in gt is true. To me it is a book of guidance, inspiration and a holy constitution.
--
Posted: 2008-04-10 13:30:35
Edit :
Quote
I believe Jimmy Saville was the first man on earth.
[ This Message was edited by: Lunion on 2008-04-24 11:17 ]
--
Posted: 2008-04-24 12:13:58
Edit :
Quote
i dont think his name would have been adam...more like UGHH!
--
Posted: 2008-04-24 12:21:39
Edit :
Quote
...watched a TV show recently where they were talking about tracing genes back through time, and the conclusion was that about 90% of the population can be linked to one ancestor ... whose habitat was in the region of today's Etiopia.
...on the Christianity ... I just think that original ideas behind it were very progressive and humaine for the time. The Church was just the corporation that took the chance to "cash" in on it and mould them as they see fit ... same can be said about the teachings of Karl Marx though ...
--
Posted: 2008-05-02 17:21:45
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-02 17:21:45, theos wrote:
...watched a TV show recently where they were talking about tracing genes back through time, and the conclusion was that about 90% of the population can be linked to one ancestor ... whose habitat was in the region of today's Etiopia.
So we are all essentially inbred?.....
Nice!
--
Posted: 2008-05-02 17:23:39
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-02 17:23:39, fatreg wrote:
On 2008-05-02 17:21:45, theos wrote:
...watched a TV show recently where they were talking about tracing genes back through time, and the conclusion was that about 90% of the population can be linked to one ancestor ... whose habitat was in the region of today's Etiopia.
So we are all essentially inbred?.....
Nice!
My Brothers and sisters rejoice! We are all related to fatreg (except for a lucky 10%)
--
Posted: 2008-05-02 18:12:21
Edit :
Quote
I can assure you all that adam wasn't the 1st man on this earth.
common sense,really,if adam had been the 1stu man on earth,then,the pictures of nomads ought to have been more handsome..
I know this is numpty thought,but on the scientific side,we evolved from gorillas,and naturally,I could go to a zoo,point out at a gorilla and say,"Hey,look everyone,I've found adam!"
but I won't..and anyway,if mr.Adam ever lived,he's dead by now, and that's the good news.
--
Posted: 2008-05-03 15:58:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-03 15:58:00, tapojyoti wrote:
I can assure you all that adam wasn't the 1st man on this earth.
common sense,really,if adam had been the 1stu man on earth,then,the pictures of nomads ought to have been more handsome..
I know this is numpty thought,but on the scientific side,we evolved from gorillas,and naturally,I could go to a zoo,point out at a gorilla and say,"Hey,look everyone,I've found adam!"
but I won't..and anyway,if mr.Adam ever lived,he's dead by now, and that's the good news.
Ok, first of im not a religous goon so don't think I am with this post. But you say that we evolved from apes as if it has been proven with out a doubt. First it is a theory. An idea with evidence, which HAS NOT been proven. Prove to me with out a shadow of a doubt we evolved from monkeys. I'm neutral in this because I don't know or care if we evolved from apes.
You say that Adam was not the first man on this earth. Well thats odd, because it does not matter what his name, was but there was a first man on earth, wether that man was called Adam, Mark, Bob, Abdul, even, it does not matter what his name was. We all share a common ancestor, we all originate from two orignal people. Yes that means you, as with every one else on the forum and the world are distant cousins.
If you look at the ice ages, most of the human race was wiped out and there was only the odd few. This is more evidence that we are all related as we are all the decendents of these people, as with those people being the decendents of two, original people. There must have been one man and one woman who cares what his name was. If evolution is correct, he was likely to have been a early human and primitive so he likely had no name.
--
Posted: 2008-05-03 17:44:15
Edit :
Quote
I believe Adam was the first man.
And i also dont believe he was a monkey or an ape like creature. Thats the biggest load of BS that science ever came up with.
--
Posted: 2008-05-03 17:49:27
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-03 17:49:27, QVGA wrote:
I believe Adam was the first man.
And i also dont believe he was a monkey or an ape like creature. Thats the biggest load of BS that science ever came up with.
You can't honestly say its BS, it is a valid theory which contains convincing evidence. But like I said before, it is not proven. That is why its a theory
--
Posted: 2008-05-03 17:55:39
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
