Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Android : Sony Xperia Z3 Compact Announced
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Android > Sony Xperia Z3 Compact Announced Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 232425 ... 596061>

admad Posts: > 500

Theny maybe try high sensitivity scene?
--
Posted: 2014-09-29 19:27:50
Edit : Quote

goldenface Posts: > 500

Yup, I had already tried that and the ISO option is blanked out. Do you think it's built into this mode?
--
Posted: 2014-09-29 19:38:00
Edit : Quote

Hilmawan Posts: 98

@goldenface
As far as i know from the whitepaper ISO 12800 is only available in superior auto mode.
--
Posted: 2014-09-29 20:47:58
Edit : Quote

goldenface Posts: > 500

Thanks a lot.
--
Posted: 2014-09-29 21:29:34
Edit : Quote

itsjustJOH Posts: > 500

Yep, just in auto.
--
Posted: 2014-09-30 02:31:52
Edit : Quote

emerson_shei Posts: > 500

Camera Gead To Head: Sony Xperia Z3 Compact Vs Nokia Lumia 1520 Vs Nokia Lumia 1020

http://allaboutwindowsphone.c[....]ra_head_to_head_Lumia_9301.php
--
Posted: 2014-09-30 06:51:56
Edit : Quote

northmonkey Posts: > 500

Z3 camera is awful, Sony never seem to improve in their cameras in my opinion, no wonder they are losing so much money.
--
Posted: 2014-09-30 07:57:25
Edit : Quote

miromiromi Posts: 481

^ funny thing is that all sony smartphones produce awful photos in allsymbian and windowsphone sites.

look at these samples taken by a photography blog that does not promote any particular brand:
http://www.photographyblog.com/previews/sony_xperia_z2_photos/ - IMPRESSIVE

they're nowhere as bad as how that site tried to portray the z2 before.

those nokia pureview fans must still be hurting from when the z2 overtook the pureview in the dxomark ranking. the author would even refuse to admit the S5 winning when it obviously wins a comparison on that site. the author simply says he'd leave the decision to the readers.

i've seen the z3's performance in various other samples and i'm not going to quickly believe a site that obviously tries to promote dead nokia's remnants. i know it's not that great with producing punchy/eye-catching colors but it's not as bad as what that site says it is.

compare that z2 review to other reviews and photo samples:

http://www.photographyblog.co[....]alaxy_s5_review/sample_images/ - GOOD QUALITY
http://www.photographyblog.co[....]kia_1520_review/image_quality/ - VERY GOOD
http://www.photographyblog.co[....]mia_1020_review/image_quality/ - VERY GOOD

i'd believe a review that actually shows the real capability of a camera by showing the performance across ISO levels and posting various samples.

i won't say the z3 is better than the better spec'd lumias because that's stupid but i definitely wouldn't believe that it's as bad as how that lumia fan's site wants to make it appear.
[ This Message was edited by: miromiromi on 2014-09-30 08:55 ]

--
Posted: 2014-09-30 08:20:32
Edit : Quote

emerson_shei Posts: > 500

DxoMark is a bad joke

Since when a site that says Apple Iphone 6 Plus has the best camera on a cell has any credibility

Stop writing bullshit... Z3 and Z3 Compact has great cameras, but they are no match for the Nokia 1020 PureView and that even a blind man sees and admits

P.S: Not a Chance. Physics Wins. Physics Always Wins
[ This Message was edited by: emerson_shei on 2014-09-30 08:56 ]

--
Posted: 2014-09-30 09:48:07
Edit : Quote

cu015170 Posts: > 500

The Z3 is not awful, bit its still a bit behind the mainstream Nokias with the current software. The 1020 and the 808 are in a different league altogether.



--
Posted: 2014-09-30 10:27:19
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 232425 ... 596061>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home