>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Windows Mobile
> Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 discussion
Bookmark topic
In a thread about the Xperia X1, all Dogmann has contributed is how the X1 just isn't the phone for him and his E90 is the perfect fit for him.
He has about 5 posts for every page, and hasn't said anything unbiased towards his own opinions yet.
How is this not trolling? Please leave Dogmann. You're making it harder for people like myself to read the actually interesting contributions other X1 enthusiasts have to share.
We get it, you're a Nokia fan. It got old after the 5th post.
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 08:08:08
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-22 07:46:04, aksd wrote:
@mode
Agree with you on a few points. HSUPA is a mus, but remember this is'nt SE's doing its the Qualcomm chipset which supports it and the X1 is basically nothing but a HTC in SE clothing, wheather anybody would like to accept it or not is immaterial it is what it is.
Well, apparently I meant a pioneer in the implementation of new technologies instead of development, since they have been quite reserved in adopting anything new for a while now. Yeah, we would all have to learn to accept that it's an HTC gadget by now
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 09:04:42
Edit :
Quote
does anyone think its wise to wait for the xperia till october?? or sgud i get the samsung i900 omnia??
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 09:45:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-22 09:45:04, tonyitalian wrote:
does anyone think its wise to wait for the xperia till october?? or sgud i get the samsung i900 omnia??
if the i900 fits your requirements, then go with that.
but its's really up to you to decide.....
im curious to see if any more changes are going to be made on the x1 just like 256mb ram was added.....
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 09:53:34
Edit :
Quote
@tonyitalian
imo, there is no point waiting for X1 as it will sometime before it comes on the market (worst case will be next year). Furthermore, it gonna be expensive. Well, HTC already would make a bunch of profit off SE on the hardware. It is much cheaper to buy from HTC direct instead of from middleman SE.
I am also looking at i900. I think the i900 is better because of larger screen, 5MP cam, haptic feedback, accelerometer and of course built-in 16Gb + card slot. If you like the X1 panels, I bet some hackers would ripped it off to be used on any WM.
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2008-06-22 09:01 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 09:58:52
Edit :
Quote
yeah ur right guys... but the point there is what really fit on our needs... but i love the xperia... cant wait for that
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 10:15:54
Edit :
Quote
Yes the i900 does look very good. With the specs it has, it could very well be the best offering on the market when its released, providing everything functions smoothly of course. though samsung are usually reliable on that front.....
personally, i NEED a physical keypad/keyboard of some sort.
so if i HAD to choose out of ONLY those 2 phones, i would go for the x1.
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 10:17:58
Edit :
Quote
The hardware in the i900 is just far out.
The processor is the new Marvel PXA310 @624Mhz it has video acceleration and can playback 700 and something videos which is better than VGA. It has OpenGL 1.1 support. A very efficent processor. SHould enjoy watching videos on it although it does'nt have a 3D gaming accelerator, not sure how it'll fare on the gamin front.
The only negative on the i900 is the wierd screen resolution of 400*240, applications might be a problem. Also since most WM apps are written for HTC based phone you might come across a bit of incompatibility. That problem does'tn exist on the X1.
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 10:18:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-22 07:46:04, aksd wrote:
@mode
...and the X1 is basically nothing but a HTC in SE clothing, wheather anybody would like to accept it or not is immaterial it is what it is.
Yes, but, SE is going to reap all the credit and brand recognition in the market for X1, not HTC. So all future Xperia devices, manufactured by HTC or not, will be credited to the SE brand name. Who's heard of the company that manufactured the p910 ?
@WhyBe
The CPU speed hardly influences it much, the OMAP2420 clocked at 350Mhz is more efficent than the MSM7200A due to excellent intergration between the processor and the GPU, a lot of the CPU load is taken by the PowerVR GPU. On the MSM7200A the 3D implementation is sub standard and most of the load is taken by the CPU.
What are you basing that on...the TyTnII ?
To tell you the truth the E90 and the X1 might just have the same amount of RAM at bootup about 80-90MB. But the difference is that the X1 would already have the mediaplayer and other utilities loaded up on the RAM while the E90 wont. Remember all we are doing is speculating at this moment. You really cant tell which will have more free mem till the final product is out. Just because it says 256MB on paper does'nt mean the user gets more mem. A diamond with 19MB RAM has less free RAM at boot than my TyTn II with 128.
So far, as of the last ROM, the 128MB X1 has 33MB of free memory on boot. However, since we know the X1 is going to have 256MB, that leaves 161MB of free RAM on startup. It would be nice to see what type of mind blowing application

includes in the final unit that would consume most of the 161MB remaining memory

.
The two press thing is'nt just X1 specific, you can make any WM phone behave similarly, so many today plugins to choose from, your phone can look totally different every day if you please

.
Can you give some examples of
"two-press" app-to-app switching in other WM devices?
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 14:44:31
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-22 09:58:52, mib1800 wrote:
...Well, HTC already would make a bunch of profit off SE on the hardware. It is much cheaper to buy from HTC direct instead of from middleman SE...
@mib1800
This would be true if we were only in it to purchase hardware instead of the overall phone design. The i900 is just a basic WM device with no extra work by Samsung on the software side. The hardware is obviously only a portion of the total X1 package.
This i900 demo doesn't look very elegant at all

In fact, let me be the first to say the i900 interface works like crap. I hope Samsung get their act together before releasing this thing.
Has Dogmann gone to bed and put you on duty?
[ This Message was edited by: WhyBe on 2008-06-22 14:49 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-22 14:51:28
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply