News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic

k guys...

ASAP HELP NEEDED!

since filefactory.com cannot give me any link to download.. I need rapidshare link, or any link to download the_laser K800 driver.

K800 driver!!! any link.. other than filefactory. Quick!


--
Posted: 2006-09-21 10:58:38
Edit : Quote


Hello again all raw
2.41

5.6c

macro
2.41

5.6c


any ideassss
sorry mates but 5.6 c macro ýs better. what about long distance?

--
Posted: 2006-09-21 11:00:21
Edit : Quote


who test the new cam drivers ,is nice also to post some pictures to see the difference ...not only to tell,,ohhh this is the best or,,this is the good one...and so on,, just prove it with pictures ,compare and so on,and then the anothers peoples to say yes you have right is good or not.....you don't have right! i make like this when i test!
--
Posted: 2006-09-21 11:00:47
Edit : Quote


For long distance, 2.41 still sharper and colourfull than 5.6c...take a look at green building and car on the street...but for macro, no doubt 5.6c is the winner.
--
Posted: 2006-09-21 11:11:25
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-09-21 11:00:21, arinrin wrote:


any ideassss
sorry mates but 5.6 c macro ýs better. what about long distance?



Photo taken with 2.41 macro is much closer to the objest then 5.61. So it is not real comparison
--
Posted: 2006-09-21 11:27:55
Edit : Quote


I try to take a picture using latest driver from Aksd (based on K800)...macro, but it was not focus...blur...I take 2 pictures and both of them blur...anyone have same problem with me?
Sorry, I can upload the picture...my network blocked.
--
Posted: 2006-09-21 11:38:32
Edit : Quote


ei ei ei! hold down yer horses matey...

wots good about the patch is that you can revert instantly to a driver specific a tha job? what ive seen is that... 5.6c has good color realism... and 2.41 has sharper details... anyway...

there has been several 5.6c drivers that came out... which one is this that were testing?

can i have a link?
--
Posted: 2006-09-21 11:39:02
Edit : Quote



Photo taken with 2.41 macro is much closer to the objest then 5.61. So it is not real comparison
[/quote]

it is 5.6c
Nearly same distance max difference is 2 cm. Light is same

5.6c ultimate buffer 600k
http://se.dgd-bg.com/

[ This Message was edited by: arinrin on 2006-09-21 10:53 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-21 11:52:42
Edit : Quote


ver 9.97 with image stabilization, brighter pictures in nightmode, and no overexposure in normal mode, 8x digital zoom (count up to 4x but 4x is 8x)

http://rapidshare.de/files/33897541/camdriver0.dat.997.html

Can not properly test because of a cloudy sky.

Later edit: this camera driver should not crash under any circumstates because the buffer for 1632x1244 image is not set therefor it uses the max buffer available in your phone

[ This Message was edited by: ady_k4e on 2006-09-21 11:12 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-21 12:10:33
Edit : Quote


is your image stabilization based on the K800 driver?
--
Posted: 2006-09-21 12:17:20
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index