>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Windows Mobile
> Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 discussion
Bookmark topic
Are the blury pictures the Xperia ones?
--
Posted: 2008-07-04 08:22:38
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-04 08:22:38, mario2004 wrote:
Are the blury pictures the Xperia ones?
Unfortunately so. But they aren't too bad. It's a prototype afterall, whereas the touches were released already and the i900 is almost at liftoff. Lots of time for SE to improve the quality, and I'm sure they can.
--
Posted: 2008-07-04 08:47:49
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-04 08:22:38, mario2004 wrote:
Are the blury pictures the Xperia ones?
The Diamond pics looks best. I wonder why Touch Pro and Diamond don't look the same? It looks like the X1 has a dirty or scratched lens. The X1 pics look hazy...very unlike BengalBoy pics with X1. The i900 shows proof that more megapixels doesn't mean better pictures
--
Posted: 2008-07-04 08:57:02
Edit :
Quote
Did you notice the EXIF data of the X1 pictures
Quite strange IMO, suppose either those pics are taken by a rather early prototype or that is not X1 at all.
--
Posted: 2008-07-04 13:09:04
Edit :
Quote
They're not blurry. They're diffused. HUGE difference. If they were blurry, it would be either the camera module or the person taking the photos' fault. Diffusion is a whole other story, and is mainly about colours - faded colours and over-exposed whites. In the case of the first photos, it's not really hard to see why the whites are over-exposed. The focus is on the trees (a darker area), so the camera adjusts to the dark area, and bang, you'll end up with over-exposed areas - in all of the photos, although the X1 and Samsung's Omnia perform worst.
--
Posted: 2008-07-04 13:30:09
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-04 13:30:09, Mizzle wrote:
They're not blurry. They're diffused. HUGE difference. If they were blurry, it would be either the camera module or the person taking the photos' fault. Diffusion is a whole other story, and is mainly about colours - faded colours and over-exposed whites. In the case of the first photos, it's not really hard to see why the whites are over-exposed. The focus is on the trees (a darker area), so the camera adjusts to the dark area, and bang, you'll end up with over-exposed areas - in all of the photos, although the X1 and Samsung's Omnia perform worst.
So basically this is a software issue?
--
Posted: 2008-07-04 22:35:52
Edit :
Quote
it may be software or hardware, but why is that on this test, the captured picture from x1 looks like from a P900/P910i capture e.g. white balance,colours etc are worst ever.. its very different from bengaboy x1 captured. Well it's still a proto so will wait for the flagship phone before finalizing our analysis..
--
Posted: 2008-07-05 08:39:14
Edit :
Quote
Yep, it's software only. Anyhow, I think this is an old software, as I've seen better from X1 in similar circumstances.
--
Posted: 2008-07-05 10:40:04
Edit :
Quote
Well softwares may wary in different prototypes... The real power of the X1 camera should be seen when the oficial phone is out (with oficial bug free firmware)... This will take some time though...
--
Posted: 2008-07-05 19:06:38
Edit :
Quote
Hi all not long now for the x1, But let me start by fresh News, My earlier post on this forum was about the decision whether to wait a little longer for the new patforms in Q4, well guess what it appears that Motorola are releasing one this October with nvidia Tegra, 8 megapixel camera
http://www.phonesreview.co.uk[....]urced-chipset-and-3g-graphics/
--
Posted: 2008-07-05 19:30:54
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
