>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia Lumia 920 PureView Thread
Bookmark topic
The screen is beautiful and the display glass is "curved" again, like on the N9 and Lumia 800, which looks better, than the "flat" glass on my Lumia 900, imo.
The 920 is a bit thicker, larger and heavier, than my Lumia 900, but it "feels" good, Nokia build quality! And I'm a woman, not a power-lifter
Our friend has bought it in Germany, it'll take a few weeks, probably more than a month, before both Lumias are available here in NL
Realising now, I've been so busy playing with the phone (didn't have much time, had to drive 80 kilometers), that I completely forgot to take a few pics, sorry for that
.
[ This Message was edited by: Marly on 2012-11-06 00:37 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-06 01:03:34
Edit :
Quote
Well,I was in a store here today and they said the 16th of November for UK. I agree the curved glass on my 800 is beautiful and makes everything look printed on the screen
--
Posted: 2012-11-06 02:21:00
Edit :
Quote
Below...
Facts And
Numbers That Prove
808 PureView PRO Not Only Is Better Than The
Lumia 920 PureView LITE In
Photos Daytime And
Evening But Also The Best Cameraphone World
Today And For
Next 2 Years !!!
All About Technology PureView PRO:
http://www.test-mobile.fr/act[....]ud-dhonneur-de-symbian-030297/
The Best Review Photographic Of 808 PureView PRO:
http://www.test-mobile.fr/tests/nokia/nokia-808-pureview-047279/
Numbers Proving The Superiority Photo From Top Of Line SYMBIAN:
More Highlighted Technichal Specifications Photographic 808 PureView PRO:
* Optical Assembly:
Carl Zeiss Vario Tessar Wide Angle 26 mm
* Construction Lens:
5 Elements, 1 Group. All Lens Surfaces Are Aspherical
* Features Lens:
One High - Index, Low - Dispersion Glass Mould Lens / Mechanical Shutter With Neutral Density Filter
* F-Number:
f/2.3984375
* Focal Length:
8.02mm
* Focus Range:
15 Cm - Infinity
* Iso Sensitivity:
50 - 1600
* Shutter Speed:
Min - 2,7s / Max - 1/676s
* Flash:
Xenon (3rd Generation) And Led (2rd Generation)
* Sensor:
CMOS FSI TOSHIBA HES9
* Format:
1/1.2”
* Surface:
85,36mm² (10,67 x 13,33mm Or 8mm Diagonal)
* Pixel Size:
38 MP (1.4 Microns) / 8 MP (3.07 Microns) / 5 Megapixels (3.91 Microns) / 3 MP (4.89 Microns)
* Total Pixel Are Used:
7728 x 5368 - 41.4 MP
* Maximum Effective Pixels Resolution:
7728 x 4354 For (16:9) / 7152 x 5368 For (4:3)
* Other Features:
4x Lossless Digital And Camcorder With Rich Recording Technology (Audio Stereo)
P.S: Somebody Still Thinks May Be The Lumia 920 PureView LITE Better Than 808 PureView PRO ??? 
Therefore Stop Comparing The PureView LITE With The Cameraphone "All Concur", If You To Compare The Wisest Course Is Compares It To Top Line ANDROID, WINDOWS PHONE And IOS !!![ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-26 23:01 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-06 06:22:19
Edit :
Quote
808 fundamentalist ...
The 920 I would say has, in dark environment , a better point and shoot camera.
The 808 is amazing in its way but i wouldnt buy it because of obvious reasons. But please ,this is not a battle to the death !
[ This Message was edited by: Ravager on 2012-11-06 07:33 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-06 08:33:19
Edit :
Quote
Strongly Agree With You !
This Is Not Battle To The Death... And Yes The Elucidation Of Facts !
And Just Me is Based On Real Numbers, Facts And Mainly Images What I'm Building My Opinion !
Unlike you, Some Members From Esato And Own Nokia... Who Want To Make One Average Cameraphone, The Best Solution Photo Story !
P.S: Lumia 920 PureView LITE When Is Even Higher
NSeries N8... How Can Be Better Than the
808 PureView Pro ?
Your Thought, Of Some Members Esato And Nokia Is Ridiculous !
For You Say That Because Of a Backlit Sensor, Focal Opening Higher The 920 Is Better Than 808 !
This Is So Illogical As To Say That The SAMSUNG EX2F (
f1.4 And CMOS BSI) Is That the Best CANON G1X (
f2.8 And CMOS FSI) !!!
Please... Less "I Think" And More "Hard Facts" ! Please... Less "Fad" And More Knowledge Photo !!![ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-06 08:04 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-06 08:43:54
Edit :
Quote
Numbers mean nothing,results do. And why you comparing the 808 with a DSLR?? No point and shoot can better a DSLR. FACT!!
--
Posted: 2012-11-06 09:22:00
Edit :
Quote
In certain conditions, the 808 can do as good as a 2010-2011 DSLR, I know that for a fact.
The 920 is going to be $100 on AT&T with a free wireless charging plate
--
Posted: 2012-11-06 21:28:14
Edit :
Quote
A More Extensive Review Of Nokia Lumia 920 PureView LITE !
http://mobile-review.com/review/nokia-lumia-920.shtml#10
P.S: Photos And Video a Cameraphone Just "Average"... In Still Await a Cameraphone Best Of What NSeries N8 And 808 PureView PRO !!!
--
Posted: 2012-11-07 00:18:44
Edit :
Quote
The HTC never got a good write up,and camera rated poor. Posted cuz someone else said it was good compared to the Nokia
http://m.gsmarena.com/htc_windows_phone_8x-review-844.php
_________________
Material things don't matter,but Rock n Roll does!!!!
Nokia Lumia 800 White
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-11-07 06:46 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-07 01:11:00
Edit :
Quote
@Bonovox...
Beyond Jealous, Photographer Terrible, Terrible Critical,
You Also Can Not You Read ???
This Topic Was Created For Photos, Facts And Comments PRODUCTS NOKIA And NOKIA LUMIA 920 PUREVIEW LITE !!!
P.S:
If You Want To Talk About HTC Products And Services, Create a Specific Topic For That ! 
--
Posted: 2012-11-07 01:44:54
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
