>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Sony Xperia Z3 Compact Announced
Bookmark topic
Impressive? They didn't fail to provide sound, but there's no bass recorded at all. Very far from Nokia mics, but could be worse
--
Posted: 2014-09-30 21:39:47
Edit :
Quote
Bend test
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guF8uBKfyQk
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 01:28:39
Edit :
Quote
i hope we haven't forgotten this blind camera comparison:
https://translate.google.com/[....]blind-comparison2-result.shtml
the 1520 didn't fare well here. the colors were way off. was consistently voted among the worst and far from the best.
must be the differences in the devices tested.
[ This Message was edited by: miromiromi on 2014-10-01 00:55 ]
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 01:51:08
Edit :
Quote
Trying to bend a phone by hand is silly, for me the most reasonable way to find out if your phone is prone to bending is by doing some tests like this.
1. Wear skinny jeans put the phone in the pocket and try to sit down.
2. Put the phone on the sofa or other soft surface such as a mattress, pillow, etc., and sat on top of the phone.
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 01:58:29
Edit :
Quote
emerson_shei Posts: > 500
Beautiful Video Review
https://www.youtube.com/watch[....]&list=UUHxEl1YkDIjbWmYuKEm6jow
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 04:10:17
Edit :
Quote
@Hilmawan thanks for posting the crops! GSMarena is the only one that has all the phones.. my hope was that DPreivew will do the same for every phone they test, but alas.. the don't.
You can see here:
http://connect.dpreview.com/p[....]galaxy-s5-camera-review?page=9
that they are missing a few phones that they've tested already, including the Z3 : (
But for me the 1520 does a little better in GSMarena's studio shots, but the difference is too small for a legitimate argument. In order to argue in terms of IQ these days you need a significant difference in image quality.. like putting the 1020 against anything else bar the 808 for example will give a result very few would argue with.. but if you are comparing phones with almost identical sensor sizes its going to be almost impossible to pick a
clear winner.
I think that the 1520/930/Icon use the exact same camera/lens combination, but I could be wrong, or they might be on a different version of WP which would play a role as well.. I am not 100% sure.
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2014-10-01 03:27 ]
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 04:26:10
Edit :
Quote
You're absolutely right even DPReview seem half-hearted when it comes to smartphone camera.
For me it was very disappointing, because what is the point of making the mobile version of DPReview if they can't do better job than some other non photography site.
I'm 100% sure that in terms of quality there is no better phone than 1020 and 808 (except maybe the new monsters from Panasonic).
But i don't agree with your opinion about 1520 in GSMarena's studio shots, because the Z3 look sharper, cleaner and has better detail to me.
But that maybe because we have different views about what is better.
What happened to 1520/930/Icon is also happens to Z1 Z1/Z1C/Z2.
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 05:44:39
Edit :
Quote
Quality of a photo is very subjective.vary's from one person to another.No photo can be perfect to all.Some might like a slightly underexposed pic for better skies and some might like slightly over exposed ones for better details of everything under the sky.So one of them would be a "better camera" to someone and the latter would be the better for some one else..both of these ppl will fight on a forum for eternity
.Same with low light shots..some might prefer a more noisy pic if it can brighten up an object while some might like a less noisy pic even if its slightly underexposed..also a lot depends on the subject you are shooting..a lot depends on what you want.
My point is..all the flagship phone cams out there are great..all have different strengths and processing algorithms.Just chose what suits you best and stop fighting
Peace
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 06:59:41
Edit :
Quote
Well said Ranjith!
How many look at the photo quality under a microscopic. Take in the big picture. For most this is more than adequate for showing in a digital photo frame or tablet.
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 11:07:51
Edit :
Quote
[ This Message was edited by: pt020 on 2014-10-12 02:56 ]
--
Posted: 2014-10-01 16:01:38
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
