>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho)
Bookmark topic
(well well....you must have some special k800 then. all other k800 pics is behind in quality against c902).
k800
c902
back to on topic:
after i seen this latest pics, i actually might can live with c905 strange front keys & its wieght, etc. if i order one today, i have it in middle of october...
and thats soon
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-28 10:30 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 11:24:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-09-28 11:24:13, plankgatan wrote:
(well well....you must have some special k800 then. all other k800 pics is behind in quality against c902).
So plankis, here's a challenge for you: I took
one of your C902 photos and:
1. Scaled down to 2048x1536 (i.e. 3 MP) using Weighted Average as the scaling method.
2. Scaled it up again to 2592x1944 (5 MP) using Bicubic scaling method.
3. Applied sharpening.
For this I used Paint Shop Pro 8.
Which of the following is the original and which was scaled down and up?
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 11:41:56
Edit :
Quote
Plank oh Plank, what for you posted pics not from C905 in thread about C905? didn't I explained to you why these 2 pics are not comparable? isn't discussion about K800 vs. C902 ended? do you feel better than others because you have better camera than others? at least... could you try to understand what you read and stop this irritating way of discussion with other people? if you have something against me, don't spam forum, use PM. roger that?
AbuBasim
great example of megapixel myth
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-09-28 10:50 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 11:44:36
Edit :
Quote
But my screen dont have 3mp resolution, I only have 1920 x 1200. So thats makes it impossible to see the different between the scale up and down and the original cause they are both scaled down to be view on my screen. Im am not completely sure im right here, but i think that this is the case.
The megepixel arent everything, but they are something....
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 12:04:16
Edit :
Quote
awwwww.... i actually looked up "megapixel myth" and it made me rethink of buying the phone
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 12:07:01
Edit :
Quote
hehe, yes, especially night pics
EDIT: don't say "WE" - you are not voice of all people
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-09-28 11:16 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 12:13:29
Edit :
Quote
The second night pic seem to be sharp and good enough...
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 12:17:23
Edit :
Quote
we was 2 people who took the pictures...thats why WE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abu, you quite something... why did you choose the one with less great details...why didnt you choose the ones with better details
you can find pics even from marcus c905 with bad details...its just depending where you looking.
c902 produce really clean pics as well....if you choose to look at them:
hell, even indoor have ok details:
and yes, every picture WE took there was k800 behind in quality.
sorry for off topic
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-28 11:34 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 12:18:15
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-09-28 12:04:16, Tobbis wrote:
But my screen dont have 3mp resolution, I only have 1920 x 1200. So thats makes it impossible to see the different between the scale up and down and the original cause they are both scaled down to be view on my screen. Im am not completely sure im right here, but i think that this is the case.
The samples I posted are shown at 100 percent scale so even a 1024x768 monitor will display them in full.
On 2008-09-28 12:18:15, plankgatan wrote:
Abu, you quite something... why did you choose the one with less great details...why didnt you choose the ones with better details
I thought it had plenty of contrast and sharpness. I take it that you're not ready to accept the challenge?
Edit: Your plate shot above before and after treatment:
The Esato tag reveals which one is treated. But can you see any difference in the photo itself?
_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-09-28 11:33 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 12:25:12
Edit :
Quote
@abubasim, great illustration mate
The top one has slightly less noise and the darks are darker. But the difference is so marginal. And that still doesn't help decide which one is the original, because that could have come from the post processing
--
Posted: 2008-09-28 12:28:27
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
