Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho)
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho) Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 259260261 ... 618619620>

masada1971 Posts: > 500

its quad band phone,so is compatible with all available networks around the world...
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 18:55:23
Edit : Quote

Bialynia Posts: 337


On 2008-09-29 18:55:23, masada1971 wrote:
its quad band phone,so is compatible with all available networks around the world...


I don't think it has the 1700 band meaning it will not work on Tmobile's 3G network in N America.
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 18:58:20
Edit : Quote

gtr83 Posts: > 500

I heard that there will be two versions, C905 for international markets and C905a for USA. Dunno if there would be a C905c (for China) though.
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 19:57:57
Edit : Quote

valgargg Posts: 22

There will be a c905a, but it still will not support t-mobile 3g 1700 band, so for me theres no point waiting for the NA version.
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 20:07:48
Edit : Quote

Bialynia Posts: 337


On 2008-09-29 20:07:48, valgargg wrote:
There will be a c905a, but it still will not support t-mobile 3g 1700 band, so for me theres no point waiting for the NA version.


So the regular C905 will only support 3G 2100? The A version will support AT&T then?
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 20:30:18
Edit : Quote

marty mcfly Posts: > 500

What I can't get my head round, is why oh why, has he used such awful pictures in his 'review'? Half the pictures only needed the EV adjusted up or down, and the pictures would have been fine! So many pictures either over exposed, or under exposed. Does he even know how to use a camera?

I remember looking at his Innov8 macro pictures that were totally out of focus and wondering why? Why not attempt to get it in focus and use that picture instead? Or does he just take one picture in each scenario and use that in the review? I'm guessing he does, which shows what a prat he really is.

No self respecting photography journalist would allow their opinions to be based on pictures that were ruined with their own bad technique. For goodness sake, he took night pictures with the C905 at ISO-320 and then posted it next to an InnoV8 picture taken at ISO-80. How can you compare the two? What a fool.

Virgile Fontaine has shown how good the C905 really is. It 's just sad that Eldar can post these pictures to show the phone in a negative light, when he clearly can't use a camera to save his life.

Edit: 300 Posts, yay!
________________
I can't think of anything to write here...

[ This Message was edited by: marty mcfly on 2008-09-29 20:52 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 21:51:05
Edit : Quote

fullforce Posts: > 500

Now now, calm down!

I think the C905 will be fine in all aspects including the cam, when it comes out. The only fear i have is that it would have the same problems with the software that the K850 had...but let's not be pessimistic! It will be fine!

[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2008-09-29 21:00 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 21:59:18
Edit : Quote

xironghostx Posts: > 500

Pessimist: The bottom is reached!

Optimist: It can always get worse!


--
Posted: 2008-09-29 22:07:57
Edit : Quote

mario2004 Posts: > 500


On 2008-09-29 21:51:05, marty mcfly wrote:
What I can't get my head round, is why oh why, has he used such awful pictures in his 'review'? Half the pictures only needed the EV adjusted up or down, and the pictures would have been fine! So many pictures either over exposed, or under exposed. Does he even know how to use a camera?

I remember looking at his Innov8 macro pictures that were totally out of focus and wondering why? Why not attempt to get it in focus and use that picture instead? Or does he just take one picture in each scenario and use that in the review? I'm guessing he does, which shows what a prat he really is.

No self respecting photography journalist would allow their opinions to be based on pictures that were ruined with their own bad technique. For goodness sake, he took night pictures with the C905 at ISO-320 and then posted it next to an InnoV8 picture taken at ISO-80. How can you compare the two? What a fool.

Virgile Fontaine has shown how good the C905 really is. It 's just sad that Eldar can post these pictures to show the phone in a negative light, when he clearly can't use a camera to save his life.

Edit: 300 Posts, yay!
________________
I can't think of anything to write here...

[ This Message was edited by: marty mcfly on 2008-09-29 20:52 ]


He used auto settings ! The fact that you see wrong settings has little to do with Eldar and more to do with problems in the C905's FW ! ! ! SE is trying franticaly to fix all that - why do you think oct is 1day away and still no c905 ! Now, with another 450 development workers been dismissed today, the 'fixing' will be more and more difficult. Next year this time SE should announce the first s60 cell and hopefully the fw will be taken care off by Nokia
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 22:19:35
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

you can't expect more from point-n-shot test. besides why so angry? C905 camera did not lost arguments in comparision with i8510
--
Posted: 2008-09-29 22:24:08
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 259260261 ... 618619620>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home