Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post your pictures (and videos) taken with your K800i / K790a
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post your pictures (and videos) taken with your K800i / K790a
Bookmark topic
photo made me K800i
http://img131.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sonycenterjw6.jpg
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 12:03:56
Edit :
Quote
Nice pic of pice of paper i think..I love AF and Macro
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 14:31:12
Edit :
Quote
can you switch off the light when you take photo's with the K800?
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 16:53:38
Edit :
Quote
you mean the red light that emit's when your focusing on something?
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 16:58:42
Edit :
Quote
digdub
You seem to resize most of your sample photos down to 1000x750pixels. Is this because more comfortable viewing of them?
Unfortunately resizing makes details as well as the much discussed and feared noise (and noise suppression artefacts) to diminish - and worst of all - the lossy compressed JPEG file format suffers during resaving as the 8x8pixels blocks get recreated.
So, why don't you upload full size samples? In HowardForum you uploaded at least one (DSC00480-full.jpg) but for some peculiar reason you uploaded it to
yousendit.com instead of
imageshack.us where your resized ones are hosted. Imageshack accepts uploading of files up to 1.5MB size, and I have yet to see a K800 photo larger than 1MB, usually around 800-900KB.
Somewhere I recall noticing you telling using
IrfanView for resizing. Correct? Anyway, I played a little with your full size photo, DSC00480-full.jpg:
Based on the resulted filesize of the resized copy you must have used the
92% Save quality setting on JPEG options window (resizing with Lanczos filter). Why not 100% - if you insist resizing?
Hope you understand, we'd love to see your fine night shots in their full glory - as genuine originals! Rather upload the originals and save locally the resized copies, if you have to consider your harddisk capacity. Thank you!
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 20:28:47
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-22 16:53:38, upper wrote:
can you switch off the light when you take photo's with the K800?
yes, you can turn the flash off if you don't want it (shortcut is the * key)
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 20:32:55
Edit :
Quote
A nice hot day!
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 20:37:46
Edit :
Quote
Wow.. now that's hot....
MarkQ now u look like a Police inspector...
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 21:10:03
Edit :
Quote
datx,
Well yes, picky I am but not mean. You should know me by now in "our" other forum... damn this ever ongoing twist, resized vs full size. Sorry upsetting you, sensitive readers.
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 23:48:41
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-22 20:28:47, Mark_Q wrote:
digdub
You seem to resize most of your sample photos down to 1000x750pixels. Is this because more comfortable viewing of them?
Unfortunately resizing makes details as well as the much discussed and feared noise (and noise suppression artefacts) to diminish - and worst of all - the lossy compressed JPEG file format suffers during resaving as the 8x8pixels blocks get recreated.
So, why don't you upload full size samples? In HowardForum you uploaded at least one (DSC00480-full.jpg) but for some peculiar reason you uploaded it to
yousendit.com instead of
imageshack.us where your resized ones are hosted. Imageshack accepts uploading of files up to 1.5MB size, and I have yet to see a K800 photo larger than 1MB, usually around 800-900KB.
Somewhere I recall noticing you telling using
IrfanView for resizing. Correct? Anyway, I played a little with your full size photo, DSC00480-full.jpg:
Based on the resulted filesize of the resized copy you must have used the
92% Save quality setting on JPEG options window (resizing with Lanczos filter). Why not 100% - if you insist resizing?
Hope you understand, we'd love to see your fine night shots in their full glory - as genuine originals! Rather upload the originals and save locally the resized copies, if you have to consider your harddisk capacity. Thank you!
yup, resizing is for easier viewing on screen, and to have a better size to quality ratio so that pictures wouldn't take take too long to load. also, i save at 90%, saving at jpg 100% quality results in a filesize which is roughly 3 times bigger at 90% but without discernible difference in quality, at least not to my naked eye.
as for hosting on imageshack, i do not know why they are always resized to 1600x1200, even though the filesize is below the 1mb limit, so i hosted them on yousendit instead.
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 12:14:32
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
