>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Is Sony Ericsson doomed?
Bookmark topic
I agree in my house samsung is a no no. all of the samsung products we have owned broke almost as soon as it was out of the warranty, this never seems to happen with sony or panasonic
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 10:54:21
Edit :
Quote
@islandprd, R1FA035. I've only experienced two bugs, media player isn't updating the video list (add videos to the video folder, then update the media player but still not in the list. You can only play the videos via file manager) and the other bug occasionally the activity menu stops working, but only if the media player has been used for hlaf an hour or more (and not every time only sometimes). I have to restart the phone to get the activity menu back.
I haven't had a single restart or lock up however.
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 12:53:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-29 10:40:04, c96sthl wrote:
I like to know for people who used Samsung Phone and claim they are better build. Have you all used it for more than 12months?
about 5 years in some cases, to judge build quality, put a samsung in one hand, lets say a G600 at 99 quid, put a w580 in the other hand and weep at the difference in quality and performance.
My good pal Island Paradise, you just have the magic touch when it comes to phones mate, do you have anything that works
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 13:56:07
Edit :
Quote
@Mweb
I was wondering the same myself as Island always seems able to get a lemon to some degree or another.
@all
Unfortunately we can't have polls on this Forum but seeing as the question of Sony's dissatisfaction with Ericsson has risen it's ugly head once again.
Just how many of the users here would go with Ericsson and how many with Sony if they were to split. Actually how many here have actually owned an Ericsson handset is also an important question as if you haven't you have nothing to compare.
I know i would love to see Ericsson handsets once more in the market place and also know i am far from being alone on this to. Well at least most of us that were lucky enough to of used Ericsson handsets in the past and whist they may not of been the prettiest they were truly great quality and packed with the latest spec's. I'll take performance over looks every time.
Marc
_________________
Blackberry Bold,8GB SDHC, Pin2553F455
Nokia E90, 8GB SDHC, Seven, Tom Tom 6
Honoured to have Won Best Debater for the 2nd Year
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2008-08-29 13:45 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 14:09:38
Edit :
Quote
Ericsson phones were certainly vastly superior to the Sony handsets available before the JV. They set the standard in technology terms, well ahead of Nokia at the time. Sony's offerings were quite poor in comparison, IMO - although I was a fan of Sony gear generally, I never looked twice at their phones.
The marriage of the two should have been perfect, but I'm not convinced it's ever really matched what Ericsson once had on its own. The tech has really moved on very little from the Ericsson days, it feels as if the same design team have just been put on auto-pilot, with little to drive them anymore. The only real innovation of SE is to bring the pointless brandnames on board - this idea that a "Cybershot" phone is in any way related to a real Sony camera, or that one music playing mobile is better than another because it says "Walkman" on it. I hate to say it, but if you want to look at how product success in one market can be leveraged in the phone business, just look at the Iphone - that's how to do it, and it takes a lot more than simply lifting a label from one product and sticking it on some otherwise ordinary phone.
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 14:35:35
Edit :
Quote
iPhone is apple's first phone. They don't have much experience with phones so that phone lacks many key features while keeping others... That's not smart move imho.
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 14:39:36
Edit :
Quote
@Max
Update it to R1CA039. Much stable. You'll be happier. I think it suffers from Memory Paging problem.
@MWEB
I do have some working unit, thank you very much Sir
The N95 hardware is not dead yet and the W910 is still going nicely. Else if everything else fails, the old hammer still work flawlessly
My low end Samsung E250 has a dead pixel. One! and it is right on the face! Under a sucky Samsung service policy here, I am not eligible to get a replacement
The consolation it is cheap.
@Dogmann
Yeah, I wonder too
Unlike some, I dont prejudice against Sony, or Ericsson. I will buy both provided they suit my liking
[ This Message was edited by: islandprd on 2008-08-29 13:45 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 14:41:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-29 14:41:17, islandprd wrote:
@Max
Update it to R1CA039. Much stable. You'll be happier. I think it suffers from Memory Paging problem.
Latest firmware should be the best...
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 14:43:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-29 14:39:36, strizlow800 wrote:
iPhone is apple's first phone. They don't have much experience with phones so that phone lacks many key features while keeping others... That's not smart move imho.
Well that "not smart move" seems to be paying well for them so far. The point is, you can't accuse the Iphone of being an ordinary phone with an Ipod sticker attached to it, which is all that SE have done with 99% of their "Cybershot" and "Walkman" phones. The first Walkman phone literally was just a K750 in white and orange colours, how pathetic was that?
Apple tried the same approach with the ROKR, it was a dismal failure and they learnt from it. The Iphone is an Ipod, but it's actually much more than just that brand, it's something iconic and innovative and new in itself. SE haven't done anything iconic or new in years, if indeed ever, they just apply their brands as if that makes a thing worthwhile in itself.
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 15:28:49
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-29 10:40:04, c96sthl wrote:
I like to know for people who used Samsung Phone and claim they are better build. Have you all used it for more than 12months?
my samsung e720 is just over 3 years old and my u600 is just over 1 year old, and neither of them have ever given me the slightest problem. whereas i have confidence in the samsung products and their longitivity, the same confidence cant be applied to SE products. they have a solid feel to them whatever they are made of(plastic, metal, whatever) - SEs never do.
[ This Message was edited by: Brightspark on 2008-08-29 16:23 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-29 17:22:05
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
