>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
Nokia 808 PureView Pro Vs Sony Xperia T (Side By Side Comparison Photo Quality) !!!
http://pureviewclub.com/2012/6243
P.S (1): However, Analyzing Frame By Frame With The 808...
It Is Clear The Superiority Of Smartphone Symbian !!!
The 808 Offers Imagery
More Bigger Detailing,
Better Dynamic Range,
Colors More Accurate And
Mainly Much Less Noise !!!
P.S (2): Congratulations
PUREVIEWCLUB By The Excellent, Fair And Complete Comparative !
--
Posted: 2012-09-26 07:23:42
Edit :
Quote
Fair for you is where Nokia phones are better
BTW, i disagree.
It's looking like Eldar sh*t pictures,for booth.
PS.: Before you get mad,listen.
808 is better,these samples are sh*t.
[ This Message was edited by: Luca-S on 2012-09-26 13:07 ]
--
Posted: 2012-09-26 14:03:08
Edit :
Quote
It Is Quiet My Dear !
I Told... I Changed !
And Respect The Opinion Whose Really Understands Photography And Technology... As The Case !!!
Really Xperia T Surprised Presented Very Good Results, Only With a Look More Technical For Note Differences And Expanding In 100% !
But... See The Photo Of "Dog", More Specifically "The Collar" His... On 808 If Reads Perfectly Which Is Written, Already On Xperia T
All It Is a Blur !!!
But That Is Typical Of Xperia Phones That Privilege The "Noise Reduction" Rather Than Detailing More Accurate !!!
--
Posted: 2012-09-26 16:20:41
Edit :
Quote
In GSM Arena review the problem of Xperia T was only with exposure and here are two samples of what i'm talking about:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]_006.jpg&idReview=820&idPage=7
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]_012.jpg&idReview=820&idPage=7
There i think it's happen the same thing.
And that comparison isn't fair because the pictures taken with 808 are in pureview mode and using ND filter.
Well,do the same thing (pixel oversampling) using the 13mpx of Xperia T and if possible reduce the EV and then show us? (to pureview club)
I'm not saying that Xperia T are comparable to 808 in picture quality but,if it can take pictures that looks more pleasant in some cases,this put it far away from other Androids.
PS.: I was just kidding and you know it.
--
Posted: 2012-09-26 20:04:35
Edit :
Quote
^ we might as well take the camera module out of the 808, and replace it with the one from the xperia.. would that be "fair" enough ?
Eldar is a clown anyway..
--
Posted: 2012-09-26 20:58:10
Edit :
Quote
No and i don't care about nonsenses like this.
The question here is do the same thing with the Xperia T picture and then compare it. (pixel oversampling and EV adjustment)
That caracterizes a fairer comparison.
And just to be more clear,i said:
- I'm not saying that Xperia T are comparable to 808 in picture quality but,if it can take pictures that looks more pleasant in some cases,
this put it far away from other Androids.
I'm comparing it with other Androids,see?
808 is unique and alone in it's class but on the counterpart it is a bulky miserable piece of Symbian crap.
Smartphone wise talking.
And no,it's not even good to compare against Xperia T in this way. (like the camera on T can't be a match for the 808's camera)
--
Posted: 2012-09-27 06:27:26
Edit :
Quote
^ Do you understand the concept of oversampling ?
--
Posted: 2012-09-27 07:19:12
Edit :
Quote
Yes. Do you want any explanation about it or about what is a fair comparison?
Well,again,the question here is put the T with the similar conditions of image.
--
Posted: 2012-09-27 13:06:27
Edit :
Quote
Yes, can you please explain to me how oversampling works.. i am a little lost here. And maybe you can share your idea on how to compare the two in a fair way.
--
Posted: 2012-09-27 22:05:35
Edit :
Quote
Ordered one of these today, always believed that my very own experience is worth more than most of those more or less biased comparisons.
We also have an N8, so we know, what a good cameraphone is
--
Posted: 2012-09-28 01:10:30
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
