News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic

WITG FAR MANAGER+SEFP try se-nse.com

if you don't have cid36 and you have cid49..don't bother!
http://www.4shared.com/dir/848909/d44b1e2e/Flash_stuff.html

here is all you need. download k750flasher .. in order to find the cid "read cid/test cable"
and then copy far.zip and unzip it in C:

after that ... your busines!

[ This Message was edited by: gxg on 2006-09-24 12:14 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 13:11:02
Edit : Quote


Somehow only in erzans pics do my drivers look inferior....I wonder why? lol
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 13:20:05
Edit : Quote


aksd, did you notice what paldrive wrote?
here`s a test on that, i dont know if i see any difference.
2.441


2.441 with fix


_________________
K750i/R1CA021/512mb msdp/custom menu/original displaydriver/no focus sound/testing camdrivers.

[ This Message was edited by: heins on 2006-09-24 12:51 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 13:25:08
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-09-24 13:20:05, aksd wrote:
Somehow only in erzans pics do my drivers look inferior....I wonder why? lol


eheheh differences in sharpness are very subtle though.
maybe more difference in colors, 2.441 is warmer (more red-yellow), 3.1 colder (more blue). Is it depending of different exposure times driver settings? (in daylight I noticed that when 2.441 takes a pic at 1/6000 3.31 takes same pic at 1/2000 or more).
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 14:15:54
Edit : Quote


@e_erzan

Hi, mate! Where did you get a tripod for your SE? I wonder how it looks.
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 15:02:26
Edit : Quote


I'm not getting any problems with blurriness in 2.441. The pic of e_erzan's with the pink and white building's in the background is too blurry for even a stock camdriver. I've taken many sharp landscape and macro pictures. I'll try and get a comparison up, but for now look at this stock camdriver pic:



I don't think that 2.441 is going to be worse than stock, and stock ain't too bad either!! So I can only conclude there must have been some tripod wobble e_erzan

We still need more comparisons, but I'm not convinced of blurriness in 2.441

--
Posted: 2006-09-24 15:16:09
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-09-24 13:00:09, paldrive wrote:
WOW! with tripod your 3.1 is sharper and clearer than 2.441!


can you pin-point which part is sharp on the 3.1 camdriver? i see no different though
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 15:55:01
Edit : Quote


about the blur, i guess the problem come when change the driver.....
i realize that after take picture using 2.441, then change to 3.1, picture blur a bit....
the same thing happen if take pic with 3.1, then change to 2.441.....
maybe there is a problem when u change driver to fast, just my 2cent...... correct me if wrong hehehe
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 15:55:27
Edit : Quote


Hi everybody
returned from weekend

some picture, raw data normal mode, auto balans, one macro













for me it is very hard to say which driver is better, this version 5.4 tweked
or v2.441 . I will continue to watch here and decide at the end.

regards to aksd and e_erzan
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 15:59:31
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-09-24 15:55:27, 2uk3y wrote:
about the blur, i guess the problem come when change the driver.....
i realize that after take picture using 2.441, then change to 3.1, picture blur a bit....
the same thing happen if take pic with 3.1, then change to 2.441.....
maybe there is a problem when u change driver to fast, just my 2cent...... correct me if wrong hehehe


can't confirm about that though , but it sounds possible to me
--
Posted: 2006-09-24 16:19:19
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index