Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 282930 ... 273274275>

davidsic Posts: > 500

too bad PERFECT, you've done pretty good pics with your k850i, now if you're happy with korean thinks no problems with that.

It's funny too see people searching hard too find bad thinks in pics taken by SE's camera phones, i don't watch it always in real size, it's good enough to watch it on pc, good to print it, i'm satified with C902, a bit better than the K850i.

If you don't shoot with a SE...your head is gonna go up his ass ! lol (i saw Hancock last night)

Thanks Plank.



Sorry for my english not perfect.

[ This Message was edited by: davidsic on 2008-07-21 17:06 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-21 18:05:43
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

Plank what scene did you used in above pics? I didn't saw worthy successor of K800 but now looks like C902 is light in the tunnel
--
Posted: 2008-07-21 18:08:26
Edit : Quote

dancingfate Posts: > 500

My pics with C902.

Low light. Macro. No flash. No edited.



Indoor. Auto setting. No edited.




--
Posted: 2008-07-21 18:17:33
Edit : Quote

-PERFECT- Posts: 461

Ianeb, have you read what i have wrote? Knocking the C902? I never think it or that my phone is the “camera king“(if you read above you can see that i mention too the bad performance about Secret), if i don’t like some aspects of C902’s pics i comment them, so, where is the problem?
Sincerely i don’t care your opinion.

David, probably not all the people usually see own pics resized, otherwise how 5 Mp. can be useful? Think my next phone will be C90...5

--
Posted: 2008-07-21 18:40:31
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500


On 2008-07-21 18:08:26, Raiderski wrote:
Plank what scene did you used in above pics? I didn't saw worthy successor of K800 but now looks like C902 is light in the tunnel



auto mostly...besides of close up..then is document (same as macro)..or sometimes face detection



ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-21 20:26 ]

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-30 12:28 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-21 20:16:18
Edit : Quote

milan91 Posts: > 500


On 2008-07-21 20:16:18, plankgatan wrote:


ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)




Horrible pic, c902 have big problem with chromatic aberrations True but sad...
--
Posted: 2008-07-21 21:36:59
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

chromatic aberrations ????... dont bother..took it away

do you know the different to have the light behind you, in front of you, or besides you ?????... this picture is taken with the light coming from the right... not even a real digi cam manage perfect quality with that kind of non optimal lightness...

it has nothing to do with some aberrations. (and it has hell no mather about the camera either, in this case). everything mather about one bloody thing in this picture... and thats the angle of the sun toward the camera. (second, IF a camera suffer of chromatic aberrations you see it on nearlly EVERY PICS... chromatic aberrations its about the lens behaves false against the light....nothing else)

here is a picture taken with the light right behind me...see some different between this 2 pictures ????

ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-21 22:56 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-21 23:42:15
Edit : Quote

milan91 Posts: > 500

Ok you know everything(yea you know to point'n'shot)... Go and read little about photography If you want i can teach you


_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/milanche91
Ericsson 628>3210>3310>3410>3510>siemens mc60>K750i>> 2x nokia 6630>>w810i>>K800i+2GB modded to max

[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-07-21 22:46 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-21 23:46:09
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

milan... dont start some silly debate about some chromatic aberrations... like a said before, IF a camera suffer of chromatic aberrations you see it on nearlly EVERY PICS... chromatic aberrations its about the lens behaves false against the light....nothing else. (for example, really cheap lenses)

by the way... that first pic is ok, thats a whole different to horrible.

_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)




[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-21 23:14 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-21 23:52:03
Edit : Quote

milan91 Posts: > 500

Yea... But if device have good lens, and good post processing chromatic aberrations are invisible
--
Posted: 2008-07-21 23:56:43
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 282930 ... 273274275>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home