Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2006-09-25 22:24:00, jackdanielz wrote:
Nooooo!
That drivers(2.441,2.72 and 2.73) sux!
I used 9.91 and waiting for the best driver!
jackdanielz tell me a reason why 2.441 is sucks??? and 9.91 is good?...you compared the pictures to see,you puted here to see also the another peoples?.....pfffffffffff!!!!
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 22:39:25
Edit :
Quote
Guys, girlz... let's not argue here.
It's a forum for god sake.. everybody have something to say. Tory e praf.. lasa-l! majoritatea sunt stupizi!
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 22:44:38
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-25 21:20:40, 1X10N wrote:
I uploaded it here:
http://rapidshare.de/files/34429689/camdrv2.72.zip.html
but write in english mate, there is no much people here who understand spanish
but nice to meet a spanish user here.
Regards!
Thanks, and sorry, but when I have seen that you were from Spanish, inmediatly I wrote in spanish
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 22:47:44
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-25 22:39:25, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-09-25 22:24:00, jackdanielz wrote:
Nooooo!
That drivers(2.441,2.72 and 2.73) sux!
I used 9.91 and waiting for the best driver!
jackdanielz tell me a reason why 2.441 is sucks??? and 9.91 is good?...you compared the pictures to see,you puted here to see also the another peoples?.....pfffffffffff!!!!
Sorry but i really don't like it 2.441 because the pictures are little (sorry for my bad english) bad around the courners.
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 22:57:07
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-25 22:57:07, jackdanielz wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-09-25 22:39:25, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-09-25 22:24:00, jackdanielz wrote:
Nooooo!
That drivers(2.441,2.72 and 2.73) sux!
I used 9.91 and waiting for the best driver!
jackdanielz tell me a reason why 2.441 is sucks??? and 9.91 is good?...you compared the pictures to see,you puted here to see also the another peoples?.....pfffffffffff!!!!
Sorry but i really don't like it 2.441 because the pictures are little (sorry for my bad english) bad around the courners.
tell me in with way they are bad ,what you mean?...just also i want to know
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 23:02:24
Edit :
Quote
Yet another forum fight... lol... why do you guys always argue? Everybody has his own preference.
I used 5.6c and I like it very much. Right now I'm testing 3.1 and 2.441 and they also seem to perform fine. I think that 9.91 is too dark, but if he likes it - what's the problem?
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 23:15:55
Edit :
Quote
Look guys...
This was taken using our phone camera:
[with Macro and Nightmode On]
And this:
... was taken using my friend's Sony Ciber-Shot N1, which has 8.1 MEGAPIXEL!
It's amazing that a 2 Megapixel phone camera can get close to one professional camera like that.
Congratulation, modders.
P.s. Driver used: E_Erzan's 3.1 (not the newest, though.. the one that came before).
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 23:20:46
Edit :
Quote
@smuko
yup u r right...!!!!!
@jackdanielz
plz show some pic n then can give comment about it. words dont mean anything.
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 23:23:55
Edit :
Quote
smuko here is no arguments
just i wanted and i was courious ,why 2.441 is sux and the another one is good...that's all!....so no arguments ....don't understand me wrong please
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 23:27:01
Edit :
Quote
@apolo: Niiice pictures, mate
Can anyone compare k750 to a N-series Nokia? I have a bet with my friend that k750 will outperform the Nokia at the same conditions - 2MP, standard settings, no digital stabilizers, etc.
Also, how can I tell which driver was a picture taken with? The EXIF info says: R1CA021 prgCXC125952_EU_1_CL 5.3
But my f/w is EMEA, and I used either 3.1 or 2.441. Why does it show 5.3?
--
Posted: 2006-09-25 23:43:45
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
