>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Sony Xperia Z1
Bookmark topic
On 2013-10-01 02:54:10, mode wrote:
My 12 hours experience with the camera- Don't be too hard on northmonkey as there does seem to be a focus issue which causes the photos to not appear as sharp as it could be especially in low light situations. Shoot enough frames and eventually you'll get one that lives up to its full potential, but by then you would have been irritated lol. Haven't been able to shoot anything yet in daylight so I'll reserve my comments on that for now. However, I find the camera to be very responsive and shutter speed is fast even in low light conditions meaning you can give the camera to a monkey and it will still produce nice pics to the untrained eyes (no pun intended). I pretty sure this is what Sony's talking about when they said it has the best camera experience or something to that effect which I would then agree with. However, there's not a lot to be desired when it comes to the mobile Exmor-RS sensor which I think has been and still is work in progress since Xperia Z. BIONZ is working really hard to make images look decent IMHO. I miss my Xperia V quality aready but I'm sure when I'm done exploring this baby, I won't be missing my XV all that much anymore, especially with its super good looks, solid feel and zippy performance in every other department!
Thank you for the feedback and the photos.
Did you shoot these two in auto mode ?
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y/c6903/201310010236WBs29n.jpg
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y/c6903/201310010228730zLz.jpg
I am only asking because 1000-800 iso seems a bit high, but maybe it was darker than it seems.
In terms of performance, it makes sense... the Snap 800 is a monster. It will be interesting to see how it stacks up against the iPhone 5s camera performance.. that thing is simply flying.
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-10-01 02:32 ]
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 03:29:31
Edit :
Quote
@cu015170 Yes, all on auto. Frankly speaking, all of those shots are 50% dimmer in real life I would say. The camera really brighten things up! That's why I think it's gonna be popular with the masses. However, tech junkies are the ones who will 'spread a good word' on the product and that's not necessarily good for Sony, not in its current state as people have super high expectations for it.
[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2013-10-01 03:28 ]
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 04:27:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-09-30 21:37:44, moogoo wrote:
looks pretty decent luwi.. other than the fact that you're making me dizzy with those slanted shots!
Thanks moogoo!
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 05:08:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-10-01 04:27:20, mode wrote:
@cu015170 Yes, all on auto. Frankly speaking, all of those shots are 50% dimmer in real life I would say. The camera really brighten things up! That's why I think it's gonna be popular with the masses. However, tech junkies are the ones who will 'spread a good word' on the product and that's not necessarily good for Sony, not in its current state as people have super high expectations for it.
[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2013-10-01 03:28 ]
Thanks!
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the camera. Its the expectations people have that are a bit out of touch.. but you can't really blame them since non of the OEMs or camera manufacturers ever cared to explain to the public how imaging (with the current tech we have) really works, and what is important.
They kept talking about megapixels over and over again for a decade, so now most people just go by that when in fact its not.
The most important part is how big the effective area of the image sensor is, and NOT into how many pixels that area is cut into. There is an ongoing debate on pixels size vs. pixel density, but ultimately.. its the area itself that makes the difference. That's the bottleneck if you will..
This is a great website that has more information on the subject:
http://6mpixel.org/en/
I recommend anyone interested in imaging to take a look.
Of course there are other factors..
But anyhow, on the Z1 .. you really can't expect much from 1/2.3" sensor cut into 1.4 micron pixels. I really don't know what people expect, but I think what you are getting its pretty good considering the imaging hardware used. Just look at how tiny that module (optics+sensor) is ...you can't expect more than that.. at least not with the currently used sensor technology.
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 05:39:08
Edit :
Quote
Looking forward to trying out Wikitude Places. Since the quality of the Z1 has significantly changed perception of those that have tried it thus far … we could quite possibly see more advanced photo and video applications come to the Android platform and to cloud services. One can only hope crap like instagram dies with real quality and creative pictures done by the top smartphones.
Sure its great at what we can do with pictures with applications etc … but ultimately its all about the subject, the angle, the idea and what the picture means that takes precedence … even the emotion or place in time it evokes or reminds us of. An example … that girl with the incredibly bright blue eyes from Afghanistan(?) that was featured on the front cover of National Geographic
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 05:43:47
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-10-01 01:14:32, moogoo wrote:
northmonkey.. haven't you left this thread yet? i don't think anybody here wants to hear your bitchin and complaining and random questions as if you give a rats ass? go play with your used ebay Z and dream of the S4 you wish you bought.
@geoffxx - yah i know it's sim related. is Z1 available in thailand yet?
official release is in BKK this week I think - I'm back in the UK in 3 weeks and will have my UK sim in, see what happens
Doesn't really matter to me as I have plenty of movies etc
any word from Clove on the SM2
I've been experimenting with the camera today using various settings and all I can conclude is is the Z1 camera is quite simply superb, if the Nokia is better I think we'd be splitting hairs, the pictures this camera can take are staggering, I was taking a few shots in low light and for a while I thought the flash was on until I looked and it was off
as for monkey - I challenge you to take a photo with your S4 and post it here with the correct date and exif info showing - not holding my breath as I think you are the biggest asswipe bullshitter on these forums - prove me wrong
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 05:44:59
Edit :
Quote
@geoffxx ha you crack me up. yah lemme know if you have movie access when you're in the UK. don't know anything about Clove and SW2 cause i ordered from handtec. Handtec said they are shipping this week.
and where are all these stunning photos you're taking? share!
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 05:54:46
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-10-01 05:39:08, cu015170 wrote:
On 2013-10-01 04:27:20, mode wrote:
@cu015170 Yes, all on auto. Frankly speaking, all of those shots are 50% dimmer in real life I would say. The camera really brighten things up! That's why I think it's gonna be popular with the masses. However, tech junkies are the ones who will 'spread a good word' on the product and that's not necessarily good for Sony, not in its current state as people have super high expectations for it.
[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2013-10-01 03:28 ]
They kept talking about megapixels over and over again for a decade, so now most people just go by that when in fact its not.
The most important part is how big the effective area of the image sensor is, and NOT into how many pixels that area is cut into. There is an ongoing debate on pixels size vs. pixel density, but ultimately.. its the area itself that makes the difference. That's the bottleneck if you will..
actually how much light gets in there is equally important
people are wondering why a 20mp camera takes 8mp photos, what they need to understand is that it is still the full 20mp sensor that is producing the 8mp photo - it's pretty clever stuff
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 05:56:05
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-10-01 05:39:08, cu015170 wrote:
On 2013-10-01 04:27:20, mode wrote:
@cu015170 Yes, all on auto. Frankly speaking, all of those shots are 50% dimmer in real life I would say. The camera really brighten things up! That's why I think it's gonna be popular with the masses. However, tech junkies are the ones who will 'spread a good word' on the product and that's not necessarily good for Sony, not in its current state as people have super high expectations for it.
[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2013-10-01 03:28 ]
Thanks!
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the camera.
We have 8Mpix camera, but Sony says it is 20Mpix. Nothing wrong you say?) Where this all magic features? Bionz,g-lens(blur at right part maybe?). 20Mpix with worse result than 8Mpix. It is too much wrong with camera. Hope they fix it. Non commercial sample at early software was outstanding, but now it is not. And i don`t understand why.
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 05:56:52
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-10-01 05:44:59, Geoffxx wrote:
the pictures this camera can take are staggering
Could you please share some of them with us ? I am yet to encounter such an image from the Z1
--
Posted: 2013-10-01 05:59:37
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
