News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic

Quote:
On 2006-09-28 07:05:36, gxg wrote:
SAYSS WHOOOO????? looll looolllllll

OF COURSE WHEN YOU HAVE IQ LESS ThAN YOUR SHOW NUMBER... EVERYBODY SHOUT @ U.... EXCEPT THE calm people who tells you in normal caracters and not bold.

Deedeeedeee deeeee !! This is CAMera moding thread You are OFFTOPIC !
"caps means to shout in a chat or a forum reply" -> nomy backto your pretious chat and forums where nobody YELLSS AT YOU.. we are moding camera hereeeee!!!!!
BACK TO MOODING OR BACK TO IRQ, ICQ!


Well I personally don't appreciate the tone (and I don't even use IRC or ICQ). If you SHOUTED IN MY EAR even if you weren't angry it would still shit me off. Typing with caps means GIVE ME ATTENTION, and honestly the answer is in the thread so if he didn't get an answer the first time just ask again calmly (or just read), there is no need to "escalate" the request to CAPITAL letters.

The plain fact is, caps looks childish, so if one wants to appear like a spoilt child, go right ahead......

Taking the tone that others are obligated to answer every question that gets asked by those who refuse to read the whole thread is the issue here, not whether someone has taken the thread off topic to tell another poster to pull their head in, which is perfectly justified imho. (mods may disagee and delete my post, but that's okay, that's their job.)

How hard is it to have enough respect to not use caps like a child when you are asking for help? Seriously....

btw, mervy's question was answered 2 pages before his first question, he just didn't read the thread. His first post was on page 187, the issue of metadata, including the posting of a metadata fixed driver, was covered on pages 184 and 185. I have no sympathy for someone getting a barracking for not bothering to read two pages back incase the issue had been covered already.

Yeah, and here's a photo :lol (aksd 2.441, macro, auto white balance, resized by esato)



_________________
File System Tweaks for the K750 K750 Tricks

[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2006-09-28 07:26 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-28 08:23:01
Edit : Quote


@max_wedge : agree, though i didn't post much here, but i always try to read or search to find what i'm looking for

wondering why..lately this thread is filled with argue
--
Posted: 2006-09-28 08:36:55
Edit : Quote


someone think they better then others......
thats why this "argue thing" in this thread will exist.....
--
Posted: 2006-09-28 08:42:35
Edit : Quote


Hello all
2 pics from morning. All 2.441
raw

florescent

--
Posted: 2006-09-28 08:42:53
Edit : Quote


who wants a good shot in low light condition or in the evening or night ,the good one is 3.1v cam driver ....with 2.441 i took more blurry pictures and was so long till i took one...but 3.1 i don't know is more faster to me and good quality.....maybe because i have a w800i or ...i don't know is like this !
--
Posted: 2006-09-28 08:47:39
Edit : Quote


1) @ max... what did i do?.. i just teasin' the guy?... what tone? mine?!
now that the word is spread and daily esato receives a lot's of new posters..only because we are tryn to modd some cameradriver here. And we have to read ~200 pages for what? Because [/b]nobie[/b] wakes up in the morning and discover that he(/she) on esato was an post in CAPITAL letters.. and of course there's a yell.. so.. he have to make things wright.
I was patient enought to read 200 pages and to learn what was to learned for my interests. Also, others have to do it because it's the ONLY way. I don't like posters who ask questions before try'n to find an answer for them by themselves. So... I think here we are on the same side.

on topic: modders..don't mess with:

sup_properties=0[0,15,9],1[0,6,0],2[0,3,1],3[0,1,0],
4[0,1,0],5[0,1,0],6[a,28,a],7[0,1,0],
8[0,4,0],9[0,4,0],a[0,2,0],b[0,4,0],
c[0,ff,0],d[0,1,0],e[0,2,0],f[0,1,0],
10[0,7,0],11[0,d,0],12[0,ff,0],13[0,15,7],
14[0,16,8],15[0,16,8],18[0,7,0];
because things are interconected and that's way you don't know why is f**ed even if you put stock values.
For example:
sup_properties=0[0,15,9]=>Exposure[Exposure,Sharpening,Focus mode]
up_properties=0[0,15,9]=> 0 [ 0 , 15 , 9 ]

a[0,2,0],Focus operation[Exposure, Flicker,Exposure]

so on and so on

so .. if you modify some parameters.. be sure that you are in the matrix and those values doesn't affect the other properties related to them.


--
Posted: 2006-09-28 09:04:54
Edit : Quote


ATTENTION! AUFMERKSAMKEIT! ΠΡΟΣΟΧΗ! ATTENZIONE! ВНИМАНИЕ! ATENCIÓN!



Ok now that should do it.....btw sorry for the caps . But we need to get back on toipc and I have a proposal:

I need 15 testers who will also do some modding on camera drivers.....the first people who PM and i MEAN PM not post in this topic but use the PM tab to PM me will be gingin the testing and modding duties I have in mind....more people will get a chance to mod later.

Now what everybody wants is the perfect driver right? and instead of wasting each others time positing up drivers for testing I will allocate one Algortihm in a standard 5.3 driver to 3 different people...I will explain what that algorithm does. What you will do is try out differnt vallues ONLY for that particular algortihm and the 3 people will post their findings and which vale was best......we then compile all the values and we get our perfect driver.........this driver will be distributed among everybody else for further testing/modifications. It will no longer be and aksd or erzan or ady driver but a "special" ESATO driver, by the ESATONIANS for the ESATONIANS lol

What do you peeps think?

Regards,
Akshay
--
Posted: 2006-09-28 09:11:01
Edit : Quote


Aksd,

I agree,
go on

regards
--
Posted: 2006-09-28 11:15:34
Edit : Quote


can someone to tell me the difference between this pictures?

http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/8265/dsc01662lx7.jpg

and

http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7834/dsc01657dy1.jpg

and here are the comparation between this 2 pictures



the full size is here http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/884/comparexu6.jpg

........and to tell that first picture from up is v.3.1 and the second is v 2.441 ...and nobody to tell me that 2.441 is the best or 3.1 is the best...is not true...they are both very good cam drivers and they are the same!.....both sharper ,good focus ,bla bla bla...just a little bit the color is different ,but not more!......so congratulation e-man and askd you are both good with this now...everything identic ! but good



[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-09-28 10:54 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-28 11:36:50
Edit : Quote


also here ...and the picture i made all raw ,but in ,,fine,, mode!



full size is here http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/8787/compar2bd6.jpg


and like this i lost half day to see ,if 2.441 is more good then 3.1 and so so.......they are both good!....

PS.I don't make publicity to nobody !...just i whant to show you,that if you give a time to you to compare between 2.441 and 3.1 ,you will see ,,no difference ,,in most of the cases

[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-09-28 10:53 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-28 11:51:36
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index