News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Other manufacturers > Who is still sure P800 will be a hit? Take a look! Orange Smartphone Bookmark topic

ok few questons

1. is this stinger or smartphone os?

2. what is the diffrence?

3. the spv was on the news this morning and it crashed could it be that the os will be unstable for a while because its so new?

4. isnt it better to have an os made by mobile specialists?

5. does the spv have bluetooth built in?

6. is the add on camera big?
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 14:25:00
Edit : Quote


SPV has no camera is same similar size to MCA-10 etc
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 14:33:00
Edit : Quote


what about the other answers

any ideas?
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 14:34:00
Edit : Quote


@gadgetboytom:

1, 2: stinger was the code-name for Smartphone 2002 in development

3: It will probably have bugs but it will be easily upgradeable and the bugs will probably get taken care of quickly

4: Who cares as long as it's good?

5: No, this is tragic IMO

6: I don't think anyone has seen it yet...

_________________
T68m -> R2F0004 on Cingular - I want my MMS!

[ This Message was edited by: jnonhoffzieg on 2002-10-23 14:19 ]
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 14:36:00
Edit : Quote


Have a look at www.pcpro.co.uk
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 14:38:00
Edit : Quote


thanks think i will wait for a while

maybe something really good will come out soon with:

built in camera
well known reliable os
bluetooth built in
big screen
handwriting recognition
polyphonic ringtones
wap 2.0 support
decent design



--
Posted: 2002-10-23 14:41:00
Edit : Quote


Well.. I guess we will have to see when the phone is available. But my guess is that the things I stated earlier will be true on an M$ phone. Just look how the M$ based PDA's behaves.

With the later software's the T68 isn't slow. And my T68 hasn't crashed once since I got the my last sw upgrade. It works perfectly, and I uses the phone heavily...
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 14:47:00
Edit : Quote


it may be good but it still lacks loads of real world features

no bluetooth (no support either)

its massive too put the camera on it as well and sh*t whats the point.

and wap 1.2.1? what? maybe that was good last year but now?

html support maybe cool but data speeds arent high enough to cope with real sites, why have cut down html when wap 2 contains the same info?

what can it do that the p800 cant do?



[ This Message was edited by: gadgetboytom on 2002-10-23 13:51 ]
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 14:48:00
Edit : Quote


adamrj thanks for the link. So which design looks better to y'all, SPV or Z100? Not sure I really love either all that much but at least they aren't ugly...

I still think my T68m is about the best-looking phone I've ever seen.
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 15:24:00
Edit : Quote


Im guessing here but seeing as the SPV has an SD card slot you can easily buy a bluetooth module for it as one is being developed for the Z100 ... if that makes any difference?

TBH what do you want a camera for the phone for anyways... its nice to get wallpapers etc but for real pics - get a real digital camera.

Apart from that I cant see any overriding issues.
--
Posted: 2002-10-23 15:29:00
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index